What is missing in my bag is that film... :-(
Close as I can get...A couple photos of me playing basketball in the very early 70's. Taken with a Rolleiflex.
As to the original question, i.e., has anybody had success at using medium format for sports; you do realize that at one time roll film and 4x5 press cameras were the norm. :confused:
... and doing that under a basketball goal is a good way to get knocked down.
The widely-acknowledged single greatest sports photograph of all time...
Ali - Liston
Neil Leifer, Sports Illustrated, Rolleiflex TLR w/strobe, May 25, 1965
Ken
I have a new-found respect for you, Vaughn...
Ken
Is there anyone who has shot sports successfully? I'd love to see some examples as they are hard to find on flickr and such.
Does auto sport count? This is some of the best sport photography I've ever seen using a Rolleiflex:
http://www.klemcoll.com/photographers/1.aspx
I have photographed a number of sports events from car racing, motor-cross to the Florida Games. I have a Mamiya C33 and a Mamiya C220 with the full set of lenses (55 to 180 mm) and would honestly say that a TLR would not be my first or second choice as a useful camera for such events. However a basketball game does have the advantages of constant lighting and a limited range of distances. My first choice would be an SLR (my Nikon N80 with autofocus, auto-exposure and auto-wind) followed by a rangefinder. The Mamiyas are fine cameras but a bit clunky for something as fast paced as a sports event.
I would suggest a hand grip for the Mamiyaflex as this allows one to use only one hand to hold the camera. The right hand is free for other things. If you can find the sports finder masks they would be worth the investment as they are easily and quickly changeable.
Successfully? I'm not sure what you would classify as successful, but I occasionally use my Autocord to shoot sport, mostly track and field athletics, although I would ordinarily prefer to use my SQ-A in these instances. I don't have any 135 gear anymore and sold most of digital stuff, so I am 'forced' to use my 6x6cm cameras for everything, but I enjoy the challenge.
Nice shots skysh4rk.
Heck yeah it counts! I wish there was a decent track near me.
IMO the N80 is too slow for sports. AF is not quick enough for fast changes in direction or distance and 2.5 fps is slower than my finger. My FA with the MD-15 is faster because I don't have to wait until it is in perfect focus to shoot. I do enjoy using the N80, though.
I have the RB/CXXX L grip but it's on a C2 right now so I still have to cock and trip the shutter with my right hand. Regarding the masks, I measured the VF and angle of view of the 180mm then drew them up on the computer. Then I found that Graham Patterson already had a post script file on his website. My measurements with a steel ruler and AOV calculations were only .5mm off on the mask aperture!
I'll have to give track a try this coming spring. Since I work in a high school, I have easy access to events and coaches.
The widely-acknowledged single greatest sports photograph of all time...
Ali - Liston
Neil Leifer, Sports Illustrated, Rolleiflex TLR w/strobe, May 25, 1965
Ironically, Leifer was one of only two photographers at ringside who had color film in his camera. The other, I believe, was Herb Scharfman, the photographer seen between Ai's legs, also shooting for Sports Illustrated, who through no fault of his own just happened to be on the wrong side of history.
I believe this may be the 22-year-old Mr. Leifer (circled) working the ring with his Rolleiflex TLR moments before the famous photograph was made...
I really like using my Bronica SQ-A with my 135mm or 180mm lenses, but the thwack of the mirror is a bit loud to be using it if you're near to the start of a race, as it could be mistaken for the starter's gun.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?