Do you use your favorite medium format lens to shoot digital?

I'll drink to that

D
I'll drink to that

  • 0
  • 0
  • 58
Touch

D
Touch

  • 1
  • 2
  • 61
Pride 2025

A
Pride 2025

  • 1
  • 1
  • 84
Tybee Island

D
Tybee Island

  • 0
  • 0
  • 74

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,358
Messages
2,773,508
Members
99,598
Latest member
Jleeuk
Recent bookmarks
0

Alexander6x6

Member
Joined
May 30, 2025
Messages
25
Location
Heidelberg, Germany
Format
Medium Format
With the moderator's permission I would like to start here the discussion about the experience with medium format lenses on modern digital cameras. It doesn't make much sense to start such kind of discussion in the digital section of this forum because the main reason people use MF lenses there is usually budget-related, not analog medium format legacy-related. I would rather hear the opinions of people who used their MF lenses for years before buying digital cameras.

My first medium-format camera was the Kiev-88. The heavily modified Hartblei 688 Master and Hartblei 1008 Studio Master cameras with Arsenal and CZJ lenses still work since 1998. In contrast, the focal plane shutter of the rarely used Hasselblad 201F, which was installed a couple of years ago, has recently broken.

It has always been my dream to use my favorite lenses, such as the Vega-28 120/2.8 or the Hartblei 150mm/2.8, for digital photography. Big sensors were always extremely expensive, and small ones didn't meet my expectations. The Fujifilm GFX 50s was the first affordable digital medium-format camera for me. Since then, I have used this camera with adapted lenses. I don't like the rendering of native Fuji lenses, which is why I only have the GF 63mm lens, which I use for snapshots.
 

Hasslebad

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 12, 2021
Messages
32
Location
Michigan
Format
Medium Format
I used Hasselblad and Mamiya 7 lenses for years before getting a digital back for my Hasselblad when it became more affordable. I limit the digital backs for studio because of the amount of overhead needed between getting white balance set, sync cable applied etc. Also my studio work is more work related where tethering is helpful to get everything right.

For leisure or family photos, I prefer film since I get a look that I’m used to and it matches a lot of my earlier photos. It’s also easier in some ways (see sync cable and not having to worry about white balancing). That said, if I can spend the time to setup, I may take the digital backs out into the field.
 

Hasslebad

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 12, 2021
Messages
32
Location
Michigan
Format
Medium Format
By the way, if I had GFX, I would consider the focal reducer adapter that allows using the Pentax Super Takumar 105mm f2.4. I think that lens has a beautiful rendering and being able to get that full field of view on a modern digital camera would be amazing.
 

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,007
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
Sure. I have a 6x9/6x7 view camera setup with a bunch of lenses that do double duty when I put a digital back on the camera. My investment in digital is somewhat limited so I can afford last generation Rodenstock digital, instead I use the film lenses I have available. It ranges from a 50mm/ƒ6.3 Mamiya on the wide end to a 150mm/ƒ9 Apo Ronar. I haven't yet had the need to go longer. My normal is a Nikkor-M 105mm/ƒ3.5. Its fairly long for a 6x4.5 sensor, but I lean long on my preferred lenses.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom