I keep them more than I should, stored haphazardly on a pile on a shelf in the darkroom. When the pile topples over, I sort it out, discard lots (still not enough) and store away in plastic containers. Not much of a 'filing system'.
The rationale behind the lack of system has two parts:
1: The prints I make have no societal relevance. I enjoy making them, and that's pretty much where it ends for most prints.
2: What I need to learn from a print, I (try to) pick up immediately, adjust process, and move on. Hence, a test or work print doesn't have much value for me on a timescale longer than perhaps a couple of days.
Now you also understand why I mentioned keeping them around more than I should. I should really discard more of them right away.
Referring to the painting and drawing part of your post, I read an old book on painting in watercolours.This is where I am. The scrap prints can come in handy for other things. Prints that are keepers go in the keepers box(es) and the ones that are close go in the “close” boxes. The tests go in a stack and when it gets too big, I purge from the bottom. Having a collection of “close” prints was handy when I was teaching photography to a neighbor kid to illustrate progress in the process.
This reminds me of a similar issue I dealt with a few years ago when I got heavily into drawing and painting again. At first I felt like every piece, no matter how atrocious, was “precious,” and needed to be kept. Then, once I’d advanced beyond the “atrocious” I did a purge and tossed about 600 drawings. Letting go is healthy.
I sometimes keep a couple of test prints that are close just for reference or sometimes I will cut them up for collages or the like.
View attachment 328212
I think a new thread is in order!Oops, the file was too big. Maybe the story it tells is that it needs to go back in the box and stay there, but a story is a story.
I don't do a lot of printing, but when I work toward something for exhibition, I make some test prints at a smaller size. Most of my work in this millennium has been from 6x6, so the test prints are usually 5x5. (Putting that on 5x7 paper allows trimming a test strip or two off the end.) That gets me pretty close to doing a 10x10 on 11x14 just by removing the 2 stop ND filter I use on small enlargements.
I've done less of it lately, but earlier in this century, I made some "mini portfolios" putting the 5x5s in a ring binder. The prints are adhered to a piece of mat board fastened to a sheet of black paper to simulate the appearance and proportions of the framed larger prints. (Yeah, I know -- "Is anal retentive spelled with a hyphen?")
Example:
View attachment 328321
Thanks! And have at it!I don't know about the hyphen, but that's a great idea. So good I plan to steal it and work on creating such binders. Looks great!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?