Not to criticize it, but that's kind of the definition of principle. Different strokes, ya know.
Not really...
Definition from Webster (a matter of principle).... a situation that requires something be done a certain way because one believes it is the only right way.
The definition usually assumes some moral reason for the principle. Avoiding cropping is just the way I work -- I do not consider it the "only right way" to work.
I also do not burn or dodge -- gasp!
Not to criticize it, but that's kind of the definition of principle. Different strokes, ya know.
Exactly.
I hope this full frame(s) platinum/palladium print is not too boring!
Several folks have said they would rather not take the photo than crop it. That borders on requiring something be done a certain way because one believes it is the only right way.Not really...
Definition from Webster (a matter of principle).... a situation that requires something be done a certain way because one believes it is the only right way.
The definition usually assumes some moral reason for the principle. Avoiding cropping is just the way I work -- I do not consider it the "only right way" to work.
I also do not burn or dodge -- gasp!
Because many think of not cropping as such: a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behavior or for a chain of reasoning.
Several folks have said they would rather not take the photo than crop it. That borders on requiring something be done a certain way because one believes it is the only right way.
There’s probably something wrong with my wiring, but it maddens me when the photos in a book are all different shapes.
I have never hear of such a thing. Do you have a source?
If you can compose with any format of your choice, why crop. Perhaps some of those who don't consider alternative distances and angles need to crop. Cameras don't compose, people do.
If you can compose with any format of your choice, why crop. Perhaps some of those who don't consider alternative distances and angles need to crop. Cameras don't compose, people do.
Try using an 8x10 view camera for an interior shot of a car in motion.
You.
Because I have yet to read/hear about anyone who ecourages the cropping of most images rather than those who seem to have strong opinions about cropping, such as the one stated in post #451: "For some photographers if it is not full frame, it is just not an image they are interested in. Not a bad image. Not a good image. They may not be interested in what others call a "good cropped photo". Of course one would forego something one is not interested in...film is too expensive to waste on what others consider good photos."How did you arrive at the conclusion that "many" no croppers think that way? Why not "some" or "a few"?
How does your proposition differ from the proposition that many think that cropping as such is: a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behavior or for a chain of reasoning.
There are a lot of compositions out in the world. Most scenes have more than one composition. Everybody gets to pick the compositions he wants, either in the viewfinder or on the easel.
Sometimes you seem like many. The anti-croppers voices are louder here.Then you quoted me incorrectly. And I am one, not many.
But you wouldn't have the ratio of 8x10 and have to crop.Well, I wouldn't. 35mm would be a better option.
Sometimes you seem like many. The anti-croppers voices are louder here.
Well thank you for noting that we are just superior. <<wink>> <<wink>> <<nudge>> <<nudge>>
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?