- Joined
- Oct 26, 2015
- Messages
- 6,670
- Format
- 35mm
China.It's not terribly expensive but I am looking for a decent priced source.
China.
If you're in Europe, try Suvatlar. Or drop me a pm; I have some that I am willing to part with, but I will only send it throughout Europe for practical reasons.
Ah too bad, then shipping would take the fun out of it. Artcraft is probably your best bet.
As to formulas, for C41 search on this forum for formulas. Photo Engineer posted an approximation some years ago: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/c41-formulas.142062/
Also have a look at the various iterations @stefan4u went through about 10 years ago: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/color-negative-developer-near-to-c41.42731/
I have tried several approaches including some of the ones listed above as well as the very simple Bonavolta formula: https://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/photo/c41_ra4_chemicals.htm
In the end, results were all pretty close when the prints were filtered for correctness, but color balance was certainly different for the various formulas (so differences in filtration). There were no very apparent quality differences to my eyes, but I didn't do measurements like stefan4u did, so my assessment is very subjective.
As to ECN-2, google for the Kodak developer formula, it's published and you can fairly easily recreate it. I modified the chemistry in some minor ways to suit the materials I had available and it seemed to work, but ECN-2 just never will print quite right onto RA4 paper so I put the whole ECN-2 project into the fridge.
BTW, for C41 I decided some months ago to go the 'official' route and got some Fuji minilab C41 chemistry and I've been using that since. It's kind of easy to work with and color filtration is more in the vicinity where you'd expect it, but again, the quality differences in real world prints between the Fuji product and various DIY solutions is not very apparent to my eye.
His C41 formula has no potassium iodide. This alone is a problem, because colour balance will be off to some extent. Iodide acts as a restrainer on the top layer for the most part, bit equally across all layers. It seems to be a very basic formula. Will it give a colour image? Of course it will, but it may have all sorts of problems like casts and, even worse, crossovers. If RA4 printing is not something you're interested in, then it might not be a huge issue, but even so, correcting the aforementioned crossovers can get tedious, no matter how good your Photoshop skills are. The formulae by Photo Engineer and stefa4u are certainly a better choice.I found this on https://jamesharrphoto.blogspot.com/2017/10/diy-color-dev-comparison.html
It looks simple enough to try. Are there any major problems with it?
Yes, you need a somewhat decent meter. The cheap yellow ones running about $10 from aliexpress aren't good in my experience.It is easy to miss target pH and this means that a pH meter is a must IMHO
They're not particularly accurate, but better than nothing IMHO. But I can't say I know very much about them. Besides, there's more than one kind of them. There are the very basic ones with a single calibration point. They're ok-ish if you don't measure anything rather far from the calibration point, so a buffer solution close to the target pH is required. Then there are also those with the two calibration points, where the pH 7 buffer is used to adjust offset voltage and the pH 10, or 4 buffers adjust the slope. These should in theory be considerably more accurate over a broader range. Which one have you tried?Yes, you need a somewhat decent meter. The cheap yellow ones running about $10 from aliexpress aren't good in my experience.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?