Diy 6x17 enlarger

Flannigan's Pass

A
Flannigan's Pass

  • 0
  • 0
  • 9
Out Houses

D
Out Houses

  • 2
  • 0
  • 15
Simply leaves

H
Simply leaves

  • 2
  • 1
  • 30

Forum statistics

Threads
198,981
Messages
2,784,045
Members
99,761
Latest member
Hooper
Recent bookmarks
0

gunner

Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
21
Format
Large Format
I,m in the process of converting an old Devere 5x7 monorail camera into an enlarger for 6x17. I've now got to the stage where I'm working on the light source, I started off with an led site lamp which worked o.k, but I then went onto making an enclosure with 2 x 100 watt equivalent led lamps. Using a lux app and my sekonic L508 I'm getting a difference of 1/2 stop between the centre and the edge of the projected area on the baseboard. Just as an experiment I took readings from my LPL 7450, with the head raised high enough to fill the baseboard and there was a stop and a half difference between the centre and the edge, going on that basis should I be content with a 1/2 stop difference with my DIY enlarger?. I've used my LPL 7450 successfully for many years and without having taken those readings I would have said the illumination was very even so I'm guessing a1/2 stop on my self build is quite acceptable?
 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,791
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
You don't give any details about where or how your are measuring the light. You mention the lens board, but is there a lens in there somewhere????
 
OP
OP

gunner

Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
21
Format
Large Format
You don't give any details about where or how your are measuring the light. You mention the lens board, but is there a lens in there somewhere????

I used a 180mm lens for the 6x17 focused a negative to give a image 2ft across on the baseboard removed the negative and then took measurements at the baseboard, just for reference I used a 150mm lens on the LPL and did the same thing with a negative focused to give a 2ft image removed negative and took readings
 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,791
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
Thanks. Did you stop down the lens three f-stops to take measures? If used wide-open you would expect fall-off.
 

blacksquare

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2015
Messages
74
Location
Czech Republic
Format
Large Format
There will be some error in the way of measuring light or working with the LPL enlarger. Stop and a half difference between the centre and the edge it's too much.

To give you an idea, it's like an exposure of 10 seconds in the middle and only 3.5 seconds on the edges.
 
OP
OP

gunner

Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
21
Format
Large Format
Thanks. Did you stop down the lens three f-stops to take measures? If used wide-open you would expect fall-off.

No I didn't, I always do when printing, but just assumed I should take light measurements with the lens wide open, stopped it down 3 stops and i am getting a lux reading of 40 in the centre of the image and 39 on the edges, I think thats pretty good. I tried the same with the LPL, when stopped down 3 stops there was still a slight variation, but stopped down 4 stops and the reading from the centre to the edge was the same.
Now that I know the light source is o.k I can go on with the rest of the build
 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,791
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
SOUNDS GREAT. I'm really, really surprised that I'm the only one who suggested stopping down. Light fall-off is one of many reasons why lenses -- on enlargers or cameras -- should be used (or tested) stopped down -- when possible.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom