The neutral backlight approach is “correct,” but yeah, it can look flat. Projection always felt warmer because our eyes adapted to tungsten light. Best compromise is scan neutral for accuracy, then warm it up a bit in post if you want that classic vibrant slide look.
I have an established workflow for black and white negatives but I have never worked with color slides before. So here are my thoughts. Ektachrome E100 is a daylight balanced film. When applied to a transparency it means, I guess, that the white card shot under daylight will have the color of the projector's light source when the slide is projected. At the same time slide is meant to be viewed in a dark room with no other light sources. So viewer's chromatic adaptation should theoretically mask any possible difference in sources' temperature. From this perspective the obvious choice would be to adapt the digitized image from the backlight to a standard whitepoint of the final space. In other words the white balance must be set by backlight as a reference. But this formally correct approach leads to a way too neutral and kind of flat result on a screen while when I see the slide over my CS-Lite backlight in its warm (aka "slide") mode the colors are so much more vibrant. So what's the right way of digitizing color slides?
Does anyone know the Kelvin ratings for the light bulb used in the Epson scanner models V600 and V850?
Send in some samples of your scan work. These flatbed scanners are garbage for digitizing chromes. At least the ones I've tried.
Does anyone know the Kelvin ratings for the light bulb used in the Epson scanner models V600 and V850?
Don't forget that film scanners have the advantage that any necessary calibration adjustments for the peculiarities of the fixed, built in light source can easily be built into the firmware or software, and thus be invisible to the end user.
Good point. I wonder if there are changes to the lamp's Kelvin over time?
I know some companies advertise a special “warm” mode that emulates a projector bulb on their light sources, but I wouldn’t trust that, especially since these products are generally only rated with a CRI at a single specific temperature.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?