Are you just on APUG to troll? A new camera at thousands of pounds every couple of years is cheaper is it? A computer just to see the images is cheaper is it? A printer to make crappy inkjet prints is cheaper is it? CD roms to make backups of backups of backups is cheaper is it? Multiple external hard drives as 'safe' storage is cheaper is it?
If you are so desperate to see the end of real photography, why the hell are you even here?
No, not trolling, and not wanting to see the end of "real" photography. Actually, this is so way OT and from the OP, that I'm not sure what or why I'm defending, except maybe to say "live-and-let-live" to the people who use digital photography, and perhaps a little wry amusement to the obsessive analogue guys who I visualise as getting red in the face at any mention of anything which might involved pixels.
Only to prove that I am an analogue guy, my own arsenal includes over 20 analogue cameras, through Minox sub min, Pentax, Leica, Rollei, Mamiya, with a dedicated fridge of some hundreds of films and packs of paper.
I have but one digital pocket camera (not even an SLR) and two specialist digital cameras, one for photomicrography and one for astrophotography, neither usable for general imaging.
So I'll go away and shut up (hooray, they cry!), but just one further point....
Andy K doubts that digital is cheaper. I said "digital was quicker, cheaper and more reliable for the casual user"....FOR THE CASUAL USER, i.e. the 95% of people who want pics of the kids and the holidays, NOT the 5% of hobby photographers.
So, Joe or Jill Public might reply....
New camera every two years at thousands of pounds....why, we paid less that £100for the new digital, which replaced the APS one which we had for 15 years, which replaced the plastic disc camera. Won't buy another until this one breaks.
A computer to see the images...already got one.
A crappy printer...already got one. But we only print a few of the pics anyone, just email them around everyone instantly. The 6x4 inkjet prints we do for Aunt Jane and Granny are better anyway than the ones we used to get at the photo-and-dry-cleaning shop in the High Street.
CDroms to back-up....never get round to backing-up anything anyway (never kept any of the old negative-thingies when used to come back from the photo-shop),
Multiple external drives for safe storage....ditto re backing-up.
Hasselblad - is that the Swedish singer we saw on the telly?
I never said that digital was better/cheaper/quicker for the enthusiast, and convenience and versatility will obviously be a bigger factor than cost for the commercial and scientific worker.
Yes, believe it or not, I am a Luddite sometimes...but I am happy to use new technology as and when it better suits my needs and purposes. All I said was that I hated to see good equipment destroyed for supposed amusement.
I shall now go and take some real photographs over the week-end. Starting off indoors, so HP5 in the Rollei to begin. But I shall slip the digital in my shirt pocket just in case I spot Nicole Kidman riding on a unicorn, don't want to miss any piccies through fiddling around with the Rollei and tripod.
Peace.