Differences between bulblamp & coldlight

hka

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
397
Format
Multi Format
Does anybody know what the differences are in using a bulblamp condensor enlarger or one with coldlight. I've heard that two types of coldlight nowadays are available, the fluorecent tubes and the led light ones.
My concern is, when using one of the coldlight heads, that the prints are less crispy and shows some lack in the highlights. Can I say that coldlight head systems tends more to a diffussorsystem. Is that the same for both types (fluorescent and led's)? What do you think are the Pros and Cons?
 

Marco B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
2,736
Location
The Netherla
Format
Multi Format

I can´t comment on your specific cold light issue, but I own both a Durst Laborator L1200 with a diffusor head (Ilford Ilfospeed Multigrade 500H) and a Durst M670 with condensor head. I have never been able to tell the difference... (well, honestly I didn't do a 1:1 test with the same negative, but I have never been disappointed with the sharpness / crispness of both)

I think this issue is overrated, but that's my 2cents worth

I think it's more down to spending time to get used to a specific enlarger's response in terms of contrast, and your darkroom skills in delivering a good print. (and good eyes to check sharpness using a grain enlarging focuser)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,695
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I have cold light, color head diffusion, condenser with white frosted blub, and point source (converted Russian 35mm enlarger), point source is quite noticeable, sharper with increased contrast. I dont see much difference between the others.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…