With FP4, you can confidently develop with 5ml.
I don't know what kind of magic you are looking for,
but with FP4+, with it's naturally long straight line
and pleasant structure, I think Rodinal will be best used with a moderate dilution ( 1+50 ) and reduced agitation ( every 5th minute ) and extended time to compensate for the reduced agitation ( 20' ). The look should be a longer scale than normal, rolling into a gentle shoulder around D 2.0
If you test for midtone density ( V=.75 ) your low values will come right in. If you test for low values, you may assume the midtones will be too low. So test for mid values. Rodinal will not increase constrast as you extend development time; rather it simply builds density across the scale very evenly.
The 'gotcha' with Rodinal is that agitation is the variable that determines the slope of the high values. Although the magic of FP4+ is that it fights this in most developers ( which I think is good ) Rodinal's ability to build acutance effects is discouraged unless agitation is reduced.
My own taste prefers the balance of repeatability, convenience, fine grain ( yes ), full speed, and moderate acutance effects at 1+50, with agitation at every 5th minute. This is a reasonable compromise with Rodinal, and gives a taste of what the classic developer is all about with chaining one to the darkroom sink, or ending up with bizarre acutance effects.
Good luck. Most folks think the Agfa suggested times to be too long, although they work for me. Perhaps you'll be well to begin your tests at those times ( extrapolating for 1+100 ) and cutting back as needed.
G'luck
.