• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Diafine revisited: Ascorbate version

I, too, would really like some deeper scientific data and proof here as a dedicated /diafine user. If you got it, then I with you !
Logan
 
gorbas said:
Nice results Relayer! Hard to tell from this small pictures, but Diafine C grain looks "mushy" - not well defined or sharp?
Click to expand...
if you need more grainly images - try to use Sodium Carbonate 10g/l instead Borax in bath B. this also increased contrast too.
 
An update:
Trond has tested his new ascorbate two-bath developer for two months, and posted results to the ascorbate-developers blog at this link:
http://ascorbate-developers.blogspot.com/2012/02/lomad-diafine-clone.html
He includes some high-contrast scenes which this developer tamed well.
He named it LOMAD -- Lazy Old Man's Ascorbic Developer -- so it should appeal to most of us.

Mark Overton
 
I made some test 16x20s from some 6x7 TMAX400 that had been processed in Diafine. Up close, you can just barely to see the grain, but it is nearly invisible. I'm really considering returning to Diafine for all my work.
 
bwfans said:
Any comments on the storage, shelf life and the capacity compare with Diafine?
Click to expand...
1 year old bath A of Diafine-C working ok and have same pH as fresh solution!
Alan Johnson said:
It seems to be the accepted wisdom that in part full bottles hydroquinone based developer (Diafine) will oxidize more slowly than ascorbate (-C version).
Click to expand...
in solution with Na2SO3 hydroquinone oxidize to hydroquinone monosulfonate:
C6H6O2 + Na2SO3 + O --> C6H5NaO5S + NaOH
as result we have extra NaOH and increased pH
 
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register