• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Developing ULF monochrome film

Megrez

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 8, 2010
Messages
26
Location
England, UK
Format
Multi Format
I wonder if someone would be kind enough to help?

I recently purchased some 10" x 12", 25 ISO panchromatic film from Wephota. The only method available to me is to process this in large dishes. I am aware that agitation, i.e. rocking the dish during development, will cause standing waves and uneven development.

Someone suggested using a two bath development stage. The first bath would contain only developing agent and restrainer in the first bath. The second bath the accelerator. They suggested 4 mins in each bath. However, they would not tell me which developer to use!

Does anyone have experience of processing in this manner, who would be prepared to share which two-part developer they used?

Many thanks in anticipation,

Gary
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,419
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Tray processing doesn't cause standing waves and uneven development Never heard that one before. You do need to rock gently but it's straight forward.

Ian
 

juan

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 7, 2003
Messages
2,709
Location
St. Simons I
Format
Multi Format
Agree with Ian - I've developed thousands of sheets of film in trays/dishes without uneven development. If you are concerned, you might search on this site for "brush development" - which, as the name indicates, uses a brush. For two bath development, search on this site for divided D-23, which is one such developer.
juan
 
OP
OP

Megrez

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 8, 2010
Messages
26
Location
England, UK
Format
Multi Format
Thanks Ian and Juan. It's very common to experience standing waves in lith printing, thus most people (including Tim Rudman) used a super-sized dish, to avoid standing waves and under development in the centre of the print. I had assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that this would be the same for large sheets of film. Thanks for your replies.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
20,025
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
There's also the shuffle method, which requires careful handling, but is a fairly common method for processing sheet film of all sizes.

One problem with doing a single sheet in a tray, if the tray is too small, is overdevelopment around the edges of the sheet. If you're processing 10x12", you should probably be using a 16x20" or larger tray.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,752
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Here is an easy test with some calcium carbonate crystals to see if you are developing standing waves in your tray. In my own experience, local exhaustion of developer coupled with the increased wave activity at the edges (due to the reflections) that cause problems.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCnfT2398mc
 

Existing Light

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
457
Location
Huntsville,
Format
Multi Format
trays that have grooves about an inch wide running lengthwise down the tray. When I developed lith film in those trays in one of my photo classes, those grooves showed up as overdeveloped strips. I guess it's possible I had the sheets in there upside down, which caused that. If you have flat trays, you might want to use those, or, at the least, wrap the inside of the tray with plastic wrap to eliminate the groove as much as possible.

Of course, if you decide tray developing isnt for you, this wont be an issue. Also, I dont know if that's a problem with lith film only or with all film, or if I just got a weird batch (arista lith film)
 
OP
OP

Megrez

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 8, 2010
Messages
26
Location
England, UK
Format
Multi Format
David, Thank you! That is exactly what I am talking about.

ic-racer - Thanks for that. I will have a look.

Existing Light - You are on the same lines as me too. I am rather surprised to hear other members haven;t come across this issue.

I have found a two-part developer and will report back with results as soon as I have process the film.

Many thanks, once again, for all of your replies.