developing Kentmere 400 in Rodinal

I would develop as normal in Rodinal, with K 400 I find you lose a stop in Rodinal, and it will be very grainy, and not what I call nice grain, such as you get with Fomapan 400

I've been thinking of developing kentmere in Ordinal, using 'stand development' Has anyone got any thoughts/ experience of this technique?

derek andrews said:

I've been thinking of developing kentmere in Ordinal, using 'stand development'

Click to expand...

While you've been thinking about it, what reasons have occurred to you for using stand development rather than a more orthodox development?
Is there something you particularly hope to gain from using stand development?

If you have a quick search of the forum for threads about stand development, by the way, you will find rather a lot. It is a subject that generates quite a lot of discussion. Here's a recent one: https://www.photrio.com/forum/index.php?threads/strange-marks-with-rodinal-stand-processing.153720/

Did this last year for test rolls, using K100 and K400. Link below:

Here's a couple of goof off test shots to compare if you'd like. The dog is Kentmere 100, the...

Try a roll by the book and see if you like the contrast.

K400 @200 isn't super grainy. Even in Rodinal. I'm surprised it is not listed in digitaltruth chart which I'm only using to determine my developing parameters since 2012.
So, I would still use it as reference. 1+25 400 is 7.5. For 200 I'll keep it for 6.5.