Developing expired T-Max 100 in D-76

Near my home.jpg

A
Near my home.jpg

  • 5
  • 1
  • 61
Woodland Shoppers

A
Woodland Shoppers

  • 1
  • 0
  • 43
On The Mound

A
On The Mound

  • 0
  • 2
  • 60
What's Shakin'?

A
What's Shakin'?

  • 5
  • 1
  • 55

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,471
Messages
2,775,629
Members
99,624
Latest member
Seanusmaximus
Recent bookmarks
0

micwag2

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
173
Location
Eastern Penn
Format
35mm
I have a few rolls of T-Max 100 that i would like to develop in D-76, because that's what i have on hand. Since i have never developed film that was expired this long (1999 i believe) is there any compensation or adjustment in developing time i should use? I ran the film through a Kodak Brownie Hawkeye Flash model if that makes a difference.
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,074
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
Yes, you can expose and develop the film at ISO 25 or 50 to make up for fog and sensitivity loss from long storage. If you are into tinkering, you can add extra restrainer (e.g. one to five grams per liter of Potassium Bromide) to your developer.
 

Karl K

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
1,108
Location
NJ
Format
35mm
Depending on the temperature and humidity under which the film was stored, you may want to adjust either the development time and/or the concentration of D-76. The film is about 15 years old, so a rule of thumb would suggest a slightly higher concentration of D-76 (perhaps an increase of about 10% concentration) to combat loss of contrast/fog. I would develop the first roll with that higher concentration and observe the results before processing the remaining rolls. Bottom line: the way the film was stored over the last 15 years will, in the end, determine your course of action.
 

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,631
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
I developed a roll of T-Max 400 120 yesterday that I found in my closet ... I shot it Saturday at box speed and developed it in ID11 1:1 along with a roll of Delta 400. Both were exposed with a light orange filter under fairly contrasty light conditions. I arbitrarily cut the developing time 45 seconds from the suggested Delta 400 which meant that it was slightly longer than the T-Max time. Both rolls are well exposed and the negatives look fine. The Delta 400 was fresh and the T-Max expired 13 years ago. Neither was stored under refrigeration but our house is air conditioned. My guess is that no particular adjustment is necessary.

http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
For what it's worth, if TMax 100 is stored properly (frozen) it will probably be just fine. I bought 50 rolls of 1996 expired TMax 100 a few years ago, and it worked just like new. But it had been frozen.
 

Fixcinater

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
2,500
Location
San Diego, CA
Format
Medium Format
I bought a bunch of 100 and 400 speed Tmax that was stored poorly, expired in 03 and developed as per normal in 1:1 D76. It worked fine but grain was worse than fresh/properly stored film would be. Not unusable, just more noticeable. In 120 it would not have been a problem, in 35mm it is now relegated to abstract landscape duty.
 
OP
OP
micwag2

micwag2

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
173
Location
Eastern Penn
Format
35mm
Thanks for the replies. This film was stored in a photographers dark room in the basement of his studio. I'm guessing 60°-70°F. I'll develop this in a day or two and we'll see how it turns out.
 

pbromaghin

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
3,798
Location
Castle Rock, CO
Format
Multi Format
I have a 100ft of the same film, expired for about as long and stored about the same way, that I haven't gotten around to testing yet. This will be interesting.
 
OP
OP
micwag2

micwag2

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
173
Location
Eastern Penn
Format
35mm
Here are a few of the pictures I developed. D-76 for the recommended time. All photos taken with a Kodak Brownie Hawkeye Flash model. Not bad considering how expired the film is and the age and condition of the camera. I picked up the Brownie for 50¢ USD.

PumpkinTable.jpg Harley.jpg Church Statue.jpg
 

Fixcinater

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
2,500
Location
San Diego, CA
Format
Medium Format
How bad was the base fog compared to new film?
 
OP
OP
micwag2

micwag2

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
173
Location
Eastern Penn
Format
35mm
I didn't notice any fogging. Because the Brownie only has one shutter speed some of the images were overexposed and some underexposed, which i expected. I'll load the next roll in my C33 so i can get a few more accurate exposures but i think they'll be just fine. Most of the feedback i got when inquiring what to expect was that it would develop ok, and it did. I want to see how it prints, but my darkroom is not setup yet. I believe they will print well also.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,516
Format
35mm RF
I would develop as normal.
 

Pioneer

Member
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
3,873
Location
Elko, Nevada
Format
Multi Format
It is terrible, almost impossible to figure out how to expose or develop. :whistling:

But don't worry. I will take care of it for you and properly dispose of it. I will even pay for shipping. :wink:
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom