• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Developers for TMY2

lawrenceimpey

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 22, 2005
Messages
73
Location
London, Engl
Format
35mm RF
I've been developing quite a lot of TMY2 recently, however I'm not totally happy with the results. The developer is Xtol (replenished) and although it's technically excellent (small, sharp grain and good tones) it's just a bit too smooth for my taste. It just lacks the kind of punch I like.

I'm not sure that switching to 1+1 would make a significant difference and I don't like grain that screams 'look at me' but if there's alternative to Xtol that would be worth trying please let me know.
 

timor

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 12, 2011
Messages
177
Format
35mm
Did you try any other developer with TMY2 ?
 

Richard S. (rich815)

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format

mrred

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,251
Location
Montreal, Ca
Format
Multi Format
You could just try more agitation. I always loved xtol 1:2. This one uses Xtol 1:2 and a post selenium bath.



As of late, I am kinda addicted to thornton 2 bath.
 

JLP

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,608
Location
Oregon
Format
Multi Format
Give Tmax RS a try, I think it will be a little more to your liking. I use it 1+9 @ 24C and it gives me full box speed.
 

polyglot

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
I use Xtol 1+1 with continuous agitation. You can make it as smooth or as snappy as you like depending on EI.

If you want more bite, Rodinal 1+50 works pretty well but you WILL get grain. Alternatively, I reckon TMY2 at 800-1600 in Xtol 1+1 has really good contrast and snap to it - similar tonality to the Rodinal at EI400 but you get 1 or 2 stops more speed and less grain.

You can see examples on my flickr, I tag all my photos with film and dev, for example at 400 and 800 or rodinal.
 

erikg

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 10, 2003
Messages
1,444
Location
pawtucket rh
Format
Multi Format
I love Pyrocat with TMY, easily my favorite combo in all formats.
 

timor

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 12, 2011
Messages
177
Format
35mm
Depends on what you are doing, TMY2 works very well with orange and red filters.
 

chriscrawfordphoto

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
1,893
Location
Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Format
Medium Format
D-76 1+1, Tmax Developer 1+7, and PMK Pyro all work well for TMY-2 for me.

Here is a page full of examples from these developers, labeled so you can see what was used for each.

http://chriscrawfordphoto.com/technical/film-examples/tmax400.php

I have not tried Xtol with TMY-2, but I have never liked it with any other film I have tried. D-76, Tmax Developer, and PMK are all great developers for this film.
 

jp498

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,525
Location
Owls Head ME
Format
Multi Format
Nothing wrong with tmy2+xtol. If it needs more punch/snap, give it more agitation. Like every 30s instead of a minute if that's what you were doing, or a couple extra inversions at each interval. Another option is to up the temperature a degree or two.

It's very responsive to changes in development, and can have as many different looks as you want depending on how it's developed, what developer is used, etc...

I've used xtol, d76, pmk, and pyrocat-hd with good results. I most commonly use pyrocat-hd.
 

Dave Swinnard

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
272
Location
Parksville,
Format
Multi Format
Another vote for Xtol, though I like mine in the 1+3 dilution, though the last couple of years I've been using Pyrocat HD (glycol) almost exclusively. (have the chems, and don't have to order it or travel to find it. (...last photo store around here closed years ago, and it's a major trip to any supplier that might have any Xtol. And since this is Canada, shipping anything isn't cheap.)
 
OP
OP

lawrenceimpey

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 22, 2005
Messages
73
Location
London, Engl
Format
35mm RF
Many thanks for all the replies. To those who said that Xtol works well, I am not disagreeing if that's the look you want it's just that I am not totally happy with it. It's not just a question of giving more agitation or development time because I'm not looking to increase overall contrast, what I want is more micro contrast (acutance) like I got ten years ago with the old TMY and Paterson Acutol (now sadly discontinued). The problem with Rodinal is that the grain is rather too large for my taste. What I was looking for was something with a bit of bite but not overly grainy.

Lawrence
 

subsole

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
143
Location
Lower Saxony
Format
Medium Format
PMK gives you full 400 asa and razor sharp images.
15 min at 21°C,agitation every 15 seconds.

Cheers
Wolfgang
 

brian steinberger

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
3,051
Location
Pennsylvania
Format
Med. Format RF
The problem with Rodinal is that the grain is rather too large for my taste. What I was looking for was something with a bit of bite but not overly grainy.

Lawrence

I was just going to recommend Rodinal. But if you're looking for slightly less grain with sharpness, try D-76/ID-11 at the 1:3 dilution.
 

MDR

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
1,402
Location
Austria
Format
Multi Format
I'll second Chris Crawfords opinion t-Max 1+7 and D76 are great developers for TMY-400 and might give you what you want. Rodinal 1:25 or 1:50 should give you plenty of snap as well.
As a note I never understood most photographers reluctance to use Kodak's T-Max developer and the RS version they are great especially the RS version.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
ansco 130 or dektol
a130 72 deg 1:8 about 7mins
dek 1:7 68 deg 7 mins

or caffenol c
i use caf c with 15 cc of spent print dev in it

ymmv
 

pbromaghin

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
3,865
Location
Castle Rock, CO
Format
Multi Format
What's wrong with tmax developer with tmax film?
 

dynachrome

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,846
Format
35mm
Terms like micro contrast and acutance are old expressions used mostly for 35mm film. With very fine grain films you do not need either effect. If you can't get the results you want with a film as good as TMY2 in the 35mm format then just use a larger format. Going from 35mm up to 6X7 will give you an excellent 8X10 or 11X14 and you will not have to try to get micro contrast of acutance. This is because the edges between tones will not just appear sharp. They will actually be sharp.
 

StoneNYC

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format
Another vote for Rodinal 1:50 TMY-2 is so fine already it doesn't hurt with a LITTLE grain, and I feel it gives some nice pop, I hand process, each agitation every minute is only ONE very gentile inversion, not 2 or 3 or 10 seconds but a single gentile inversion and back. Seems to help give it some nice pop