Developer volume and capacity

Water from the Mountain

A
Water from the Mountain

  • 2
  • 0
  • 17
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam

A
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam

  • 0
  • 0
  • 21
Lotus

A
Lotus

  • 3
  • 0
  • 38
Magpies

A
Magpies

  • 4
  • 0
  • 75
Abermaw woods

A
Abermaw woods

  • 5
  • 0
  • 72

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,520
Messages
2,760,474
Members
99,393
Latest member
sundaesonder
Recent bookmarks
0

TheTaoOfPhil

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
6
Format
35mm
Hi,

In the Darkroom Cookbook (pp. 40-41), Steve Anchell suggests that 250 ml of undiluted developer is the bare minimum to develop 80x80 inches of film (e.g., 1 roll of 36 exp. 35mm), but suggests adding an extra 100 ml per roll. When the developer is diluted, he has a formula for further developer volume. I find this suggestion troubling because of the effective reduction in the number of rolls I can develop in one tank (e.g., 2 rolls per 4-roll tank).

Is anyone following this advice and have you noticed a meaningful difference in your negatives?

Also, I am not sure how this advice relates to developer capacity. It seems to be standard practice to toss developer that's been diluted, but to reuse developers such as D-23 that is used undiluted. But if one is trying to maximize developer action, perhaps even undiluted developer should be discarded, because the developer's effectiveness per square inch of film is reduced?

The specific developer in my case is D-23. I just mixed a batch from raw chemicals and am getting ready to use it for the first time.

I appreciate comments and advice. Thanks!

--Phil
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,849
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
Hi,

In the Darkroom Cookbook (pp. 40-41), Steve Anchell suggests that 250 ml of undiluted developer is the bare minimum to develop 80x80 inches of film (e.g., 1 roll of 36 exp. 35mm),
I appreciate comments and advice. Thanks!

--Phil

I believe you mean 80 square inches of film (1x80) not 80x80, which would equal 80 rolls of 135x36 film. The rest is what Kodak recommends as well.
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,765
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
This is not germane to your particular question but - is 80 x 80 a typo?
I'm guessing yu probably mean one roll of 36exp 135 = ~80 square inches ?

edit: damn that fast-typing man
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Since developers can vary widely in composition one really cannot specify accurately a minimum amount of developer before dilution. What works for D-76 would not work for a highly concentrated developer like Rodinal or HC-110. Anchell did a disservice by even implying that such a concept can be generalized.
 
OP
OP

TheTaoOfPhil

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
6
Format
35mm
This is not germane to your particular question but - is 80 x 80 a typo?
I'm guessing yu probably mean one roll of 36exp 135 = ~80 square inches ?

Woops. yes, I meant _one_ roll of 36 exp 35mm.
 

Chris Douglas

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
87
Format
35mm
Phil,

I read Anchell's book when I was starting out and took his advice. Previously, I was using D-76 1:1, but I only used enough solution to cover the reel. (35 mm) I noticed I had to increase development times about 10% over published times, and still got kind-of flat negatives. Now I use 15 oz total, or 250 ml of stock diluted 1:1. Negatives now look right using published developing times. Yes, it is a pain to have to use a bigger tank to hold all that solution, but it works. I don't have any experience with other developers, but it seems to work fine with D-76. Good luck

Chris
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,969
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Paradoxically, a replenishment regime is one of the best solutions to the developer economy conundrum.

When you use replenishment, it doesn't cost you any more to put a litre of developer into a tank, because you are going to re-use most of it anyways.

You do need larger tanks to take advantage of this.
 

Karl A

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
73
Location
Toronto, ON
Format
4x5 Format
I also read that in his book, and it wasn't something I had consciously thought of before, but I believe it is an important point.

What I believe Anchell is saying is:

1. use more than enough developer (i.e. more than the minimum technically required), in order to ensure that is not an issue affecting the development of your negatives
2. if you dilute a stock solution 1 to 1, you must use twice the volume you would use of the stock solution to ensure there is enough developer, and so on for increased dilutions

I have only ever used D-76, but those seem like good advice to me.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,022
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Using undiluted D-76 in, one increases the development time 10 to 15% for every 4 sheets of 4x5 developed to account for the weakening of the developer.

One qt of straight D-76 can develop 16 sheets of 4x5. Say the dev. time is 10 minutes. Dev the first 4 at 10 minutes, dev the second 4 at 11 to 11.5 minutes, the third four at around 12 to 13 minutes. The last set of four 4x5's develop for 14 minutes or so. Then toss out the D-76.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom