Developer for Efke PL100 4x5 sheet film

Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 8
  • 5
  • 73
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 80
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 6
  • 0
  • 92
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 10
  • 1
  • 115
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 5
  • 1
  • 86

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,842
Messages
2,781,732
Members
99,725
Latest member
saint_otrott
Recent bookmarks
0

jaimeb82

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Messages
329
Format
Multi Format
I don't have a lot of experience developing my own film, just tried this summer with 35mm. I used Ilford Delta100 + XTOL + Ilford rapid fixer. Results were good and I used XTOL as (stock) 5Liters use and get rid of it.

I am playing with (4x5) Efke sheets and was wondering if I can use XTOL or if another developer will be best. On the instructions for use of the Efke film they recommend:

efke FR 16(1+19)
Micorphen
Rodinal(1+12)
D-76
T-max(1+4)

I ideally would like to use a developer that once I used I can put down the drain. It is less confusing for a beginner and I can control the results better.

Thanks in advance.
 
OP
OP
jaimeb82

jaimeb82

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Messages
329
Format
Multi Format
It is the same, KB100 is 35mm and PL100 is sheet film. But they recommend (1+12) Is that 12 parts of water for 1 part of Rodinal?
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,926
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
I don't have a lot of experience developing my own film, just tried this summer with 35mm. I used Ilford Delta100 + XTOL + Ilford rapid fixer. Results were good and I used XTOL as (stock) 5Liters use and get rid of it.

I am playing with (4x5) Efke sheets and was wondering if I can use XTOL or if another developer will be best. On the instructions for use of the Efke film they recommend:

efke FR 16(1+19)
Micorphen
Rodinal(1+12)
D-76
T-max(1+4)

I ideally would like to use a developer that once I used I can put down the drain. It is less confusing for a beginner and I can control the results better.

Thanks in advance.
D-76 stock 7mins @ 20c
D-76 1+1 10mins @20c
I'm a 45 plus years user of D-76 no reason to use anything else (okay, I'm baiting some responses here!)

Rick
 

MikeSeb

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
1,104
Location
Denver, CO
Format
Medium Format
I'm with Rick, as a fellow Rodinal apostate.

Hard to beat D-76 or Xtol for just about anything. TMAX is a bit pricey but lasts forever and is convenient to use. It looks to me a lot like D-76.
 

P C Headland

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
822
Location
New Zealand
Format
Multi Format
I use either Rodinal 1+100 for about 18 minutes or PC-TEA 1+50 for about 10 minutes. Both are one shot developers, but PC-TEA is a home brew.

With Rodinal, I prefer 1+100 dilution @ 20C, and cutting down the agitation (5 inversions each minute for the first three minutes, then one inversion every three minutes). This seems to help the shadows, and keeps the highlights from blocking up.
 

mhanc

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2008
Messages
329
Location
NY
Format
Multi Format
I use Xtol undiluted with Adox CHS 100, which is the same film as the Efke. Very happy with the results of this film/dev combination.
 

djkloss

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 17, 2004
Messages
735
Location
Cambridge Springs, PA
Format
Multi Format
are you using tank or tray development? I use Rodinal 1:99 stand develop for 1 hour and it works great for me. You're going to find a lot of different responses here. Your best bet is to be patient and try them all. And keep a notebook. The only time I used Rodinal 1:10 was after reading Les McLean's book on the Creative Image when pushing film to the extremes ISOs. And it works great on those.

Have fun.
 

Bosaiya

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
396
Location
Sumner, Wash
Format
4x5 Format
Pick something and stick with it. Try out the various combinations of dilution, time, and temperature. Remove as many variables as possible. Get to a point where you can replicate and anticipate. From there make small adjustments to only one thing at a time so you know what to expect. There is no one right way to do things.

That said, you can't go wrong with Rodinal. 1:25, 1:50, or 1:100 it's all beautiful.
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
X-Tol will work just fine with any black and white film. So will D-76, HC-110, Rodinal, or any other black and white developer. It is not a question of which developer as much as it is how much work you put in to learning what to do with it.
 

Martin Aislabie

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
1,413
Location
Stratford-up
Format
4x5 Format
X-Tol will work just fine with any black and white film. So will D-76, HC-110, Rodinal, or any other black and white developer. It is not a question of which developer as much as it is how much work you put in to learning what to do with it.

Very succinct :smile:

Martin
 
OP
OP
jaimeb82

jaimeb82

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Messages
329
Format
Multi Format
I finally went with xtol in a jobo constant agitation beseler rotary base machine for 5:45s @ 23degrees, (it is hot here in NYC) water for stop bath and kodak rapid fixer with hardener for 5minutes. change the side of the jobo tank every 30 seconds so developer touches all over the negatives sheets. Thanks for all the responses. At the end, trial and error helped a lot.
 

Shawn Dougherty

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2004
Messages
4,129
Location
Pittsburgh
Format
Multi Format
I had nice results with Rodinal 1:100 and Efke PL100. Gave up on it due to inconsistencies in the emulsion. Some boxes were great, some were not...
 

holmburgers

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
4,439
Location
Vienna, Austria
Format
Multi Format
Reopening an old thread.

I've developed a number of Efke PL100M 8x10" sheets in HC-110 (B) for 6 minutes in a tray, 1 at a time (scared about damaging the emulsion) and rocking the tray for 10 seconds every 30 seconds.

In every case, I'm getting what seem to me to be rather thin negatives. The film is old stock, expired in '09, but I've been shooting it at EI 50 and still this is the case. Only in the specular highlights and a direct reflection of my photo-flood in a window am I getting really nice density in the neg. The scale looks decent, but I suspect when I go to print it I'll need a rather high-contrast VC filter.

Just curious if anyone has some comments. Expose more, develop more, see if I can make a fine print as it is? I might be asking this question prematurely, but people's thoughts are always helpful.

thanks!
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,478
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
Hmm---I've used a similar regime, but at EI 100 and with less agitation, quite a bit with good results. It seems weird too that this film, a couple of years expired and (I assume) in decent storage, would lose all that much sensitivity. At the risk of asking a dumb question, but given that you're in Kansas and it's January, is there any possibility that things are colder than you expected?

I guess I'd try more development first, in your position. Have you shot the film before (in whatever format) and gotten results you liked?

-NT
 

holmburgers

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
4,439
Location
Vienna, Austria
Format
Multi Format
Thanks Nathan,

Cold is something I had considered, but the 1st sheet I developed (and the one I'm referring to) was used in a fresh developer solution that started out at 21° and probably creeped down around 20° by the time I slipped the sheet in. For this sheet I think we can rule out cold dev., though honestly, some other sheets later that night might've suffered from this.

Truthfully no, I haven't gotten anything great out of this film yet. They just seem so... thin! There's detail & nice scale, but I'm just amazed at the lack of density, especially compared to my Tri-X 320 sheets.

The film was gifted to me by an APUGGER, so I can't completely vouch for its storage, though I trust that this person didn't do anything crazy, but maybe not refrigerated.

I agree, I will extend development times and see what happens. I don't know if I can afford any more speed loss. Also, I'll keep a close eye on temperatures next time, just to be certain.
 

Eric Rose

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
6,843
Location
T3A5V4
Format
Multi Format
I use PL100 exclusively for 4x5. Probably shot 100's of sheets of the stuff. The best developer I have found is PyroCat-HD using semi stand technique. For average scenes I too rate it at 50asa.
 

nworth

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
I've used both D-76 (mostly) and Rodinai; with this film. Both work well. I think I like Rodinal a bit better, but I don't really like the film that much. I had a fair stock, so I used it.
 

holmburgers

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
4,439
Location
Vienna, Austria
Format
Multi Format
The film is appealing because it's so cheap, and especially so if it's gifted... :wink: ...but I'm gonna use it almost exclusively for making separation negatives and so it's good for testing that, especially at a minimum of 3 negatives a go.

I plan to even cut some up into 4x5" sheets to make testing a little more economical. I'd like to experiment with other developers, but I'm trying to standardize on HC-110.

I'll try to get some densitometer readings and more info as I sort this out.

Thanks guys
 

snederhiser

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
161
Format
Medium Format
Hello;
Not much has been posted about the exposure of the film. I would shoot at recommended rating and use a skylight or light yellow filter with exposure correction. How accurate is the shutter that you are using? This is an old school emulsion and would think that extra time in the developing tank would be in order. 10 min in full strength D-76 would be my starting point and adjust from there. The only film I used that was thin was Agfapan 100, but still gave a good printable negative. Steven.
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,478
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
I went back and looked at some of my old negatives developed using this regime, and I think it may be true that they're short on density in the highlights specifically. The *average* density looks good, but I don't really see any bulletproof Zone MCMLXXXVI highlights. They were taken in fairly soft lighting, though, so I'm not absolutely sure that this is a trait of the film vs. something specific to these images.

-NT
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom