Now my confusion comes from the literature that states that a 1L bottle will develop 16X36exp rolls. Now is that dependent on tank capacity?
This leads me to the next question. I am planning on starting with a single reel tank to get the hang of it. Now if I decide to develop 4 rolls in an afternoon then would I mix up only enough to do that? Or does one mix the whole L with 4L of water?
Yes, although you may be able to fudge that -- say by diluting more than the manufacturer recommends, as MattKing describes. His post has given some good advice (although I think he meant "If the tank you use requires that amount or less you are fine" rather than "If the tank you use requires that amount or more you are fine").
....
The danger to using smaller-capacity tanks comes when you try to use a very dilute developer; there'll be fewer moles of developing agent in a smaller tank, so if the developer is diluted to the point that there's barely enough developer to do the job in, say, a 350ml tank, using the same dilution with a 250ml tank could become an issue.
srs.....
Actually I did mean it the way I posted it, and I think that the second part of your post shows the rationalesrs5694 said:His post has given some good advice (although I think he meant "If the tank you use requires that amount or less you are fine" rather than "If the tank you use requires that amount or more you are fine").(in a particularly clear and cogent way, I might add).
If it helps, you can say it as follows:
If one uses working solutions at the same dilution, bigger tanks end up using more of the original stock solution.
marsbars said:I have heard that the plastic ones are easier to load than the stainless ones but the stainless ones last longer. Is that really such an issue or not. I like the idea of a tank that will outlast my lifetime if I take decent care of it. I am not opposed to spending a little more on a better tank.
re: The "more" vs. "less" thing: It just occurred to me that MattKing and I were thinking in two different ways, which may be important to make explicit for marsbars' benefit:
- I was thinking in terms of the volumes required, at the specified dilutions, to get the specified number of rolls (16) out of the product (1l of Ilford DD-X) using the specified dilution (1+4). To get 16 or more rolls, you need a tank that uses 312.5ml or less of solution. This ignores what I believe MattKing was thinking about....
- MattKing was thinking in terms of the required capacity of the developer to completely develop a roll of film. If the claim of a 16-roll capacity is based on this, then you'd need to use at least 312.5ml of solution to be sure of complete development.
I don't know in which way Ilford means its "16-roll" claim. My assumption (perhaps a mistaken one) is that products marketed to hobbyists would use meaning #1; after all, the manufacturer doesn't know how big any individual's tank is, and so would create recommended dilutions that would work well even with small-volume tanks and number-of-rolls claims that are reasonable given typical tank capacities. It'd certainly be disastrous to the product's reputation if people tried to develop rolls in smallish (say, ~250ml stainless-steel) tanks using the recommended dilution and encountered failures.
I'm not very familiar with Ilford DD-X, but Ilford does have loads of information on their Web site. You might be able to find a document there that clarifies this matter.
Edit: I wrote the above while MattKing was writing his latest reply; I didn't see it until after I posted mine!
...the capacity recommendations from the manufacturers are
sufficiently conservative as to leave a little wiggle room, Matt
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?