Dense Negatives

arigram

Member

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

5,465

Location

Crete, Greec

Format

Medium Format

• Jul 3, 2006

• #1

What are the negative aspects (no pun intended) of a dense negative apart from longer than normal exposure times? Let's say I overexpose a shot that it contains so much information that the frame is quite dark on the negative strip. It doesn't seem to have any information missing, so are there any problems really?

 

George Papantoniou

Member

Joined

Mar 21, 2005

Messages

984

Location

Athens

Format

Medium Format

• Jul 3, 2006

• #2

Wrong overall contrast (too high, in case of overdevelopment) and / or compression of highlights (bad highlight separation) in case of overexposure. Lots of other bad things, too

 

OP

OP

arigram

Member

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

5,465

Location

Crete, Greec

Format

Medium Format

• Jul 3, 2006

• #3

What other bad things?
Do they cause cancer? Global warming? Is my cat safe? Should I go live in a bunker?

 

Marco Gilardetti

Member

Joined

Jun 7, 2005

Messages

800

Location

Torino, Italy

Format

Large Format

• Jul 3, 2006

• #4

Mr. Overexposure is usually not friend of Miss Resolution. So is Mr. Overdevelopment (which make grains worse too).

 

Dan Henderson

Member

Joined

Feb 6, 2005

Messages

1,880

Location

Blue Ridge,

Format

4x5 Format

• Jul 3, 2006

• #5

I agree with the pronounced grain problem. I recently accidentally overexposed and made some very dense negatives while attempting to capture a scene of a bridge in very thick fog. Yes, the detail is still there, and being an extremely flat image to begin with, contrast was not a problem, but oh, the grain. Especially with the film and developer I was using I expected a liquid appearance to the fog...

 

Roger Hicks

Member

Joined

May 17, 2006

Messages

4,895

Location

Northern Aqu

Format

35mm RF

• Jul 3, 2006

• #6

Grain goes up, sharpness goes down. Important with 35mm, less and less important as the format gets bigger.

With many film/developer combinations, compressed or blown highlights are not a risk at anything under about 3 stops overexposure.

Cheers,

Roger (www.rogerandfrances.com)

 

doughowk

Member

Joined

Feb 11, 2003

Messages

1,809

Location

Kalamazoo, MI

Format

Large Format

• Jul 3, 2006

• #7

In Bruce Barnbaum's The Art of Photography he talks about the 12 useful zones of information that a film can yield; and ways to manipulate prints accordingly. I expose about 1-2 stops longer than meter reading in order to ensure detail in shadow areas. If the SBR is greater than 5, I don't try reduced development; but rather use some of Barnbaum's techniques for printing higher contrast negatives.

 

Jim Jones

Subscriber

Joined

Jan 16, 2006

Messages

3,740

Location

Chillicothe MO

Format

Multi Format

• Jul 3, 2006

• #8

In addition to the above mentioned problems, you might have to buy some Potassium Ferricyanide to bleach the overexposed negatives so printing times can be measured by a clock instead of a calendar. Like doughowk says, overexposing can be used as a creative tool.