Interesting that this thread has had almost 300 views but only 3 votes in the survey?
Possibly because very few people who view it would be willing to pay anything for an ultra-large format daylight tray
I was in a garden centre the other day and spotted a large plastic tray similar to the above for use on a greenhouse bench....
I was in a garden centre the other day and spotted a large plastic tray similar to the above for use on a greenhouse bench....
Amazon show some as well.
What can it do that a Jobo 3063 and a roller base cannot (leaving aside any effects of inappropriate developer choices)? That is the key defining factor price-wise.
Tray development in the dark, however, is something that would potentially keep people from trying a format. The bigger the sheet, the more irritating that would be. So, providing something that overcomes that hurdle might encourage more people to pick up a really big camera. Fact is, if you're jumping into bigger than 8x10, you're going to spend a lot of money on camera, holders, lenses, and film. A good way to develop that film is a minor expense compared to all those.
Yeah, we should have included a "I'm not a good enough photographer to shoot ULF" response. (That would be my personal answer!)Possibly because very few people who view it would be willing to pay anything for an ultra-large format daylight tray - but they're still curious to look at it. For instance, I wouldn't buy one but did want to see the thread.
There are not a lot of people shooting larger than 8x10.
Yeah, we should have included a "I'm not a good enough photographer to shoot ULF" response. (That would be my personal answer!)
I'd make that "not crazy AND rich enough". Crazy enough? Hell yeah. Rich?....nah.I'd prefer "I'm not a crazy or rich enough photographer to shoot ULF"
I'd make that "not crazy AND rich enough". Crazy enough? Hell yeah. Rich?....nah.
What can it do that a Jobo 3063 and a roller base cannot (leaving aside any effects of inappropriate developer choices)? That is the key defining factor price-wise.
What can it do that a Jobo 3063 and a roller base cannot (leaving aside any effects of inappropriate developer choices)? That is the key defining factor price-wise.
I'd make that "not crazy AND rich enough". Crazy enough? Hell yeah. Rich?....nah.
Yup, for me this is the reason why I clicked it before, but didn't vote. Had it included an option "less than $400" or "no willingness to pay at all", I would have voted for sure.
Also, I didn't count the number of ULF photographers on this site, but a ballpark figure for the relatively active ones would remain stuck at well below a dozen. If this survey so far has gotten 3 votes, this means that out of those less-than-a-dozen, a substantial percentage would actually be willing to pay >$400 for this. I'd call that a remarkably optimistic outcome and much more than I would have imagined.
Suitable for daylight film development? That's a novelty.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?