I exposed a few rolls of Delta 3200 120 last summer, carefully metering with an incident meter, film speed set to 1000. I developed it in divided Pyrocat-HD, and the resulting images were pretty darned good. I probably would rate it at 800 next time. It needed a touch more contrast and a touch more exposure. I'd probably use Pyrocat-HD in the 1:1:100 dilution next time unless the scene is very contrasty. This film has a loooong, flat tonal scale, but it's lovely stuff.
Peter Gomena
I would recommend doing a test, if you can verify that your pyrocat is still good by successfully developing a roll of your usual Delta 400/100.
Expose a roll where you bracket your exposures. 400, 800, 1600. Develop for the 16 minutes you used before, agitating for 10s every minute.
Examine the roll and pick the exposure index that gives you enough shadow detail.
Now shoot a whole roll at that exposure index, let's say it was 800.
Cut the roll in thirds and develop one piece at a time. If 16 minutes makes the negative highlights look too thin, you need to increase development when developing the second piece of film. Judge from there and see if you can get perfect negs with the third piece.
Important: Judge the negatives by printing them.
This is something you should do any time you use a new film and developer combination.
Then, on top of this, if you feel a need to shoot a roll at EI 1600, you obviously have to compensate for the underexposure by developing longer, and a new test will be in order.
Good luck,
- Thomas
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?