Dektol vs D-72

David Lyga

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,445
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
I remember reading a time ago that Dektol had a bit more staying power (ie, more capacity) than D-72. Why? Does anyone know (or wish to divulge) whether Dektol deviates from the 3g Metol / 12g HQ per liter which comprises D-72 for stock solution? - David Lyga
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
At one time Kodak made a liquid developer that some people erroneously referred to as liquid Dektol. Since it used Dimezone rather than Metol it probably had a greater capacity. Perhaps that is what you are thinking about. AFAIK Dektol has been D-72 with the changes for packaging that I mentioned previously.
 
OP
OP

David Lyga

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,445
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
Yes, it was Dektol that was supposed to have a bit more capacity. And michael, these developers used to be packaged (decades ago) as two parts: A and B, because, I guess, they did not have that sequestering agent. - David Lyga
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Developers are packed in 2 parts due to the fact that both parts interact. Discovering how to avoid that problem allows a single pack developer. Versatol was a single part liquid developer. I liked it, but it was discontinued. I guess HC110 is the best replacement.

D72 and Dektol are virtually identical except as previously described above.

PE
 

markbau

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
867
Location
Australia
Format
Analog
In David Vestal's classic book, Art of Black & White enlarging he opined that D 72 lasted longer in the tray for him. I've never mixed D72 but I know that Dektol and Bromophen are indistinguishable as far as I can see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…