braxus
Member
Im just off on a rant today, so dont read any further if you must.
I had a roll of Panatomic X dated expiry 1946. Since I know Pan X keeps very well and even rolls from the 70s turn out good, I'd thought I'd for fun shoot the roll and see what happens. I was hoping to post some pics here. But that was wishful thinking. I had a local lab develop it in HC-110 for 4:40 min.s. The result was the neg was close to black. Only in a few spots on the entire neg was there any hint of an image of something. So I guess 1946 is a bit too far back.
Driving home I'd thought I'd pick up a couple rolls of Plus X, since I usually only keep stock of Tri-X. There is only one store here in town that carries more then the bare minimum of films. I got there to find out they've cut down their selection AGAIN and totally deleted bringing in BOTH Plus X and Tri-X! But they did have the TMAX films in stock still. No thanks. They also carry Ilford with stock of FP4+, HP5+, Delta 100 and 400. I'm a Kodak man, so I declined getting any Ilford this round. Don't get me wrong I like Ilford, I just prefer using Kodak's versions of these films.
So I went home and plunked my empty film cannister back on my dresser. Im just not happy to now have to drive at least 30km, if not 120km, just to get my staple films. But its getting to that point. Im not even sure the 30km lab will be keeping stock of these same films anymore. Since they are the ones having distribution issues with Kodak, it looks like its driving into Vancouver for me from now on.
Luckily I still have a large stash of film in my deep freezer. I might be filling the box even more full now that I need to go to the city to get film. Problem is even with my 4 banger it easily cost $20-25 of gas just to make the trip.
I had a roll of Panatomic X dated expiry 1946. Since I know Pan X keeps very well and even rolls from the 70s turn out good, I'd thought I'd for fun shoot the roll and see what happens. I was hoping to post some pics here. But that was wishful thinking. I had a local lab develop it in HC-110 for 4:40 min.s. The result was the neg was close to black. Only in a few spots on the entire neg was there any hint of an image of something. So I guess 1946 is a bit too far back.
Driving home I'd thought I'd pick up a couple rolls of Plus X, since I usually only keep stock of Tri-X. There is only one store here in town that carries more then the bare minimum of films. I got there to find out they've cut down their selection AGAIN and totally deleted bringing in BOTH Plus X and Tri-X! But they did have the TMAX films in stock still. No thanks. They also carry Ilford with stock of FP4+, HP5+, Delta 100 and 400. I'm a Kodak man, so I declined getting any Ilford this round. Don't get me wrong I like Ilford, I just prefer using Kodak's versions of these films.
So I went home and plunked my empty film cannister back on my dresser. Im just not happy to now have to drive at least 30km, if not 120km, just to get my staple films. But its getting to that point. Im not even sure the 30km lab will be keeping stock of these same films anymore. Since they are the ones having distribution issues with Kodak, it looks like its driving into Vancouver for me from now on.
Luckily I still have a large stash of film in my deep freezer. I might be filling the box even more full now that I need to go to the city to get film. Problem is even with my 4 banger it easily cost $20-25 of gas just to make the trip.
Last edited by a moderator: