Well, regarding Agfaphoto and Rollei Retro: this is simply the rest of the materials Agfa coated in Leverkusen back in 2005. This is not exactly fresh stuff and since it was bought from the insolvency in no way reflects the true costs of manufacturing film.
Efke 25/50/100: I remember that the 100ft roll was 30 DM (yes, this is about 15!) 10 years ago. The price went up significantly in the following years. After trying a few I gave up due to marketing hype and quality issues (don't know the quality today).
Hello Andreas,
concerning AgfaPhoto and Rollei Retro you are generally right.
But 1,49 or 1,19 for a 36Exp. 135 film is not so far away from the current production costs.
Look at Arista Premium (Kodak Tri-X and Plus-X): 1,99$ for 36Exp. 135 film. That is about 1,56. Arista LegacyPro (Fuji) is only bit more expensive.
That is only a bit more than the Agfa APX prices.
So Kodak, Fuji and Freestyle are able to make profit with films in this price range. From fresh production.
During the last months there were some official statements and interviews from Kodak concerning their successful restructuring efforts. They have invested in cost reducing technology and can now make much smaller batches due to current demand at profitable prices. They said that all of their film products are profitable.
I think Fuji has done similar investing in cost reduction. At least their Neopan films are cheaper than some years ago. I remember paying 4,50 for Acros 100 in 2004. Now I pay only 3,07.
Concerning the falling prices for Efke films (at least in Europe), that is quite simple: It is an advertising initiative from Fotokemika (Efke). They want to increase their market share, and now offer more attractive prices than before (there were official statements from Efke distributors concerning this topic). That is the reason why the original Efke films are now cheaper than the identical Adox CHS films.
Regards, Jana