Deciding what printer--Canon Pixma Pro 200, Prograf Pro 300 or Pro-1000?

Dog Opposites

A
Dog Opposites

  • 2
  • 3
  • 118
Acrobatics in the Vondelpark

A
Acrobatics in the Vondelpark

  • 6
  • 5
  • 205
Finn Slough Fishing Net

A
Finn Slough Fishing Net

  • 1
  • 0
  • 113
Dried roses

A
Dried roses

  • 14
  • 8
  • 208
Hot Rod

A
Hot Rod

  • 5
  • 0
  • 121

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,474
Messages
2,759,588
Members
99,514
Latest member
cukon
Recent bookmarks
0

Duceman

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
660
Location
Home
Format
Multi Format
As I mentioned in this post, I recently picked up a Canon Selphy CP1500. It had been more than a decade since I had made any of my own prints. With the Selphy, I came to realize that I really do miss making prints, and while the Selphy does a great job, it's limited to 4x6. The last printer I had was an Epson, which I got second-hand. Don't recall the model, but once I got it set up, it printed great. But then I let it sit for a while, and when I came back, the print heads were all clogged and I literally ate up almost all the ink to get them clean again. Same thing happened the next time I came to print. This was so frustrating--and costly--that I ended up selling the printer at a loss. After that, I relied primarily upon Costco for any printing I needed; always thought their product was sufficient. But then, as we all know, they too got rid of their in-store photography departments, and again recently got out of the photo business altogether. And while there is still a photo print shop near me, it's always a hassle getting there and they aren't exactly cheap: $15 for 11x14 and $20 for 12x12 (their largest offerings). I've also come to the realization that my darkroom printing goals are simply going to have to be put on an indefinite hold. I've got a backlog of photos I'd like to print, so I've come to the conclusion that I'd like to get a new printer.

Majority (but definitely not all) of my prints will be black/white. I've sort of set my sights on Canon, with either the Pixma Pro 200 or Prograf 300, or possibly the Pro-1000. I have Affinity Photo on my machine, so won't be able to use the Canon print plug-in for Photoshop, which I understand is really helpful for the Pro-200 printer (though, if absolutely necessary, my wife's machine does have Photoshop, so could potentially use that). But then I see all the inkwells, and their pricing, and then get put off again by my clogged printer head nightmare I had previously, and wonder if in the end it will be worth it.

In that regard, I was wondering what experiences others have had with these printers, if they've ever encountered print head clogging after idle periods, how long do the inks last and what is the relative cost for photos.

I've come across several comparisons between the Pro 200 and 300, which has me leading towards the 300, but still haven't seen what one should expect regarding amount of average output before changing ink tanks.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Duceman

Duceman

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
660
Location
Home
Format
Multi Format
Well... decided to go for it. The printer I decided to go with arrived today. Haven't taken it out of the box yet.

Pro-300.jpg


When it came to making the final decision, I was torn between the Pro-300 and Pro-1000. And while the ability to print larger prints on the Pro-1000 weighed heavily, I ultimately chose the Pro-300 based primarily on ink consumption. No, not in making the prints themselves, but on head cleaning, idleness, etc. I had read/seen more than one review that essentially stated that the Pro-1000 was a printer "that like to be used," and during or after long periods of idleness, it drank up a lot ink as part of its cleaning diagnostics. The Pro-300 did not do this as much, and being that I don't plan on printing every day (maybe not even every week), I concluded that over time the ink costs associated wit the Pro-1000 may start becoming excessive on a per-print basis.

Can't wait to get some time to get it out of the box and running.
 
Last edited:

nmp

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
1,995
Location
Maryland USA
Format
35mm
Pro-1000 has cheaper ink/ml (B$H price $0.675/ml vs $0.90/ml for Pro-300) which would alleviate the ink usage (cost) problem somewhat depending on the frequency of printing. But more importantly the tiny 15 ml cartridges in Pro-300 means you would be changing them much more frequently. I have the Epson p400 which also has about 15 ml cartridges and I seem to constantly change one cartridge or another, which is a big nuisance, even though my printing is also not very frequent or high volume. I regret not getting one of its bigger siblings, either P600 and P800 at the time.

What's done is done though, now that you have the printer at your door step. Hope you enjoy it! Inkjet printing can be fun, if all goes well....🙂 I have heard the Canons' B&W is pretty good.

:Niranjan.
 
OP
OP
Duceman

Duceman

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
660
Location
Home
Format
Multi Format
Pro-1000 has cheaper ink/ml (B$H price $0.675/ml vs $0.90/ml for Pro-300) ...

I did consider that. However, I recall someone commenting that when the Pro-1000 "warms up" after a period of being shut off/unplugged, it'll consume nearly 4mL per container.... and may consume that on a weekly basis if put in "sleep mode." I do not know if that is accurate, but if it is, that $0.24/mL savings goes out the window quite fast.
 

nmp

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
1,995
Location
Maryland USA
Format
35mm
I did consider that. However, I recall someone commenting that when the Pro-1000 "warms up" after a period of being shut off/unplugged, it'll consume nearly 4mL per container.... and may consume that on a weekly basis if put in "sleep mode." I do not know if that is accurate, but if it is, that $0.24/mL savings goes out the window quite fast.

I guess that's true - although you would be hard pressed to find a side-by-side comparison anywhere, particularly using conditions similar to one's own usage habits. So in the end it is a crap-shoot (in my experience) and there are always surprises. The printer makers will get you one way or another.

Good luck...do keep us posted of your experiences with the printer.

:Niranjan.
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,745
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
My Epson 3800 finally succumbed to head strikes after about 6000 prints. It's replacement, an Epson P800, is going strong, although after only 6 years and 3833 prints. Prints with Epson ink and paper are all I want.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom