It's not a thread about D-76 & Xtol but Sandy if you'd tested Tmax in D76 and Xtol in a 35mm camera, with high level lenses then there's an unmistakeable difference in sharpness & resolution between the two.
Ian
I have a Pentacon Six, a Kiev 6C (okay 6S), and a Salyut-S. They are appropriate for the lightweight arts photography I am doing now. The lenses are nice. Some care is needed with the bodies, to cock the shutter before whatever. Overall, the cost is low, and the images are nice.
Everyone here will tell you that the only cameras worth having are the very best of the best. Well, it depends on your situation. If you are a professional, you would not be asking this question anyway.
If the normal lens set-up on the Yashica is not quite flexible enough, you are looking for lenses. I'd recommend looking first at the lenses you need for your intended uses. The Pentacon Six (and Kiev 60) mount lenses are a good value.
Guess the next question is do I NEED MLU. While I love the look of the 88 and the interchangeable backs are a nice to have, going for a 60 makes more sense from a reliability point of view.
Well new to me at least..
I LOVE 6x6 and for much of my 6x6 work I'll continue to use my Yashicamat but there are times when the fixed lens isn't ideal and thus a SLR ( or Mamiya ) would be better.. Been researching options and trying to figure out best option..
Based on current ebay.co.uk prices (for second hand kit ) :-
SQA - £300 with 80mm/WLF
Hassy 200FC - £400 with 80mm/wlf
Pentax 67 - £330 (approxx)
Mamiya C330 - £200 (approxx)
I know the Pentax is 6x7 but looked at it as it's close to square. I then looked at the only affordable new options.. Yep you've guessed it the remanufactuered Kievs.
Kiev 60/Arax MLU Standard - £220 (approx) including TTL Finder etc.
Kiev 88/Arax non-MLU Basic - £220 (approx) WLF/80mm/film holder
Kiev 60/Hartblei MLU Standard - £150 (approx) including TTL Finder etc.
Kiev 88/Hartblei non-MLU Basic - £300 (approx) including TTL Finder etc.
My gut instinct is to go for either a Hartblei Kiev 60 or a Arax non-MLU 88. I am assuming both options are a lot more consistant and reliable than the base Kiev models and it is based on this assumption that for the level of use ( quite light weight use overall ) I am going to do these two options represent the best value for money.
Thoughts?
Kiev quality control is all over the map. A particularly good sample of any given lens can be excellent.
Interesting link and they do have second hand stuff. I did of course mean second hand not new.
Kiev is dead. Arax will soon follow as they do not manufacture anything, only resell a product that is no longer made, and they now cannot get any more product from the closed Arsenal Kiev factory.
.
The Hassy seems to be the best of the lot...assuming the FP shutter is, in fact, in good repair.
I have a Bronica SQ-Ai and I have found the optics generally disappointing. I've tried no fewer than 3 different 80mm PS lenses and none of the three was better than the 80mm in my Yashicamat 124g. Two were noticeably worse. My 150mm S lens is going back to KEH because I've got better optics in the $5 plastic telescope I bought at the gift shop at the Boston Museum of Science circa 1980.
Kiev quality control is all over the map. A particularly good sample of any given lens can be excellent.
.
Keep in mind that Kiev has gone the way of Bronica: They went out of business, the Arsenal factory where all of the Kiev cameras were made has been closed, and only cameras already built are available.
Kiev is dead. Arax will soon follow as they do not manufacture anything, only resell a product that is no longer made, and they now cannot get any more product from the closed Arsenal Kiev factory.
.
I have a Bronica SQ-Ai and I have found the optics generally disappointing. I've tried no fewer than 3 different 80mm PS lenses and none of the three was better than the 80mm in my Yashicamat 124g. Two were noticeably worse. My 150mm S lens is going back to KEH because I've got better optics in the $5 plastic telescope I bought at the gift shop at the Boston Museum of Science circa 1980.
Strange. Have you checked the body for misalignments?
Trond
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?