Tim, I'm shooting with a Eastman Kodak 2D, so I'm with you on the $1000. As far as the adapter board goes, it could be useful if you had lens you wanted to use on multiple cameras.
Roger
Have you used a Deardorff before?
Get under the hood of one of these and you'll understand... they put all the controls exactly where they need to be without looking.
Amazing camera.
BTW, I live in the south bay if you ever need to look at one.
tim in san jose
Have you used a Deardorff before?
Get under the hood of one of these and you'll understand... they put all the controls exactly where they need to be without looking.
Chinese aluminium & plastic crap vs Chicago mahogany craftsmanship... it's a no-brainer.
Unless, of course, you're Ansel Adams.
Speaking of no-brained, nice racist slur there.
If it's "aluminium & plastic crap", why does it matter where it's built? What led you to add where it's made, ignorance, Xenophobia or a pinch from both pots?
If it were just 'plastic and aluminium', that's fine, but in using Chinese as an adjective against Chicago in a sentence, then I reckon you are comparing two products or manufacturing techniques/materials/quality standards by 'race', and then yes, that's certainly racist :-( To me, bad quality is universal, but then equally, so is good quality. I own a Japanese Wista, which I love, but I would equally love a Chinese Chamonix, a French Arca-Swiss, or a US Deardorff - having played with them all, they are all beautiful cameras with different charms... Deardorff's are great, but then, read the lengthy thread on the LF forum about the current company and the messy dealings some (not all) customers have had with them. No-one's perfect.
Marc!
First off, identifying the location of origin is NOT racist. Get off your PC high horse. He was comparing two products or manufacturing techniques/materials/quality standards by location and perceived manufacturing standards. One happens to have been made in Chicago, one in his opinion, made to inferior standards in China. Oh my gosh, like that would ever happen? Go down to Walmart and see for yourself. I heard nothing about race in that sentence.
rolls eyes once again.
I prefer metal cameras.
My guess is that this will fall on deaf ears. The easy route is to keep peddling fear and loathing; the more difficult is trying to understand that we're all in this together.
The original reference to China is an irrelevance. It is a generalisation. It is both presumptuous and inflammatory. It vilifies the Chinese.
generalises - saying it isn't so, doesn't stop it from being so!!Chinese aluminium & plastic crap vs Chicago mahogany craftsmanship... it's a no-brainer.
- how in any way is that relevant to anything at all? Do you suggest that a plausible argument can ONLY be made in English by a native speaker of the language? That's really odd.Perhaps being from Australia, English isn't your primary language?
On that we can all agreeNobody is perfect.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?