I agree with Alan that viewing a dry print is the only reliable way to judge tonalities, especially in the highlights.
As for viewing stations and lighting: I have an incandescent (halogen) 50W flood over my fixer and rinse tray for evaluating wet prints. If a print is good enough, it gets dried and hung up on a magnetic white board on one end of my 10-foot darkroom. This is lit by track lighting that is a combination of warm halogen lighting and "daylight" incandescent flood lights (they're blue and are about 5000K). This is my best and preferred approximation of what I think is ideal gallery lighting. I'll make a few slightly-different prints and hang them up next to each other for evaluation. I believe in wasting time evaluating instead of wasting materials making lots of prints.
I also like to step outside and evaluate the prints under daylight, both in the shade and sun, keeping in mind that really bright viewing conditions open up the shadows a lot. If I just printed for the prints to be viewed in bright daylight, the shadow detail would disappear in dimmer gallery lighting. I try to find the best compromise for possible lighting conditions and often make a few prints on either side of center, i.e., a print for dim light, a print for really bright light and one that looks best to me on the white board.
One never knows how their prints will end up being displayed. I like a rather bright combination of incandescent and daylight for my prints, and settle on that. I hate fluorescents and daylight LEDs. Even warm LEDs are not really a continuous spectrum nor a continuous source (most mains LEDs are pulsed). Give me the more natural incandescents and the sun.
Best,
Doremus