I suppose it could be something like that, but I’m hoping to hear from people in the industry that might have firsthand knowledge. As Kino is speculating, there may be a technical problem. I have noticed, however, that some recent pictures of war exposed in broad daylight were dimly lit and desaturated, which looks intentional as an editorial decision. But it might not be that.I'm reminded of the purposely darkened portrait of O.J. Simpson that graced the cover of Time magazine (I think it was). The picture you showed looks like a college campus, darkened to reflect dark days.
Carelessness, ineptitude and ignorance on the part of the underpaid, under-experienced people who are doing things now.
I kind of think the target is now mobile devices rather than desktops.I believe it's because since they are meant to be viewed on a computer, they are calibrated to look normal when the computer screen is at full illumination. If they are posted too bright, if the viewing computer is at full illumination, they become unwatchable.
I don't think we realize enough how posting images for millions of computers with different illumination set-ups is a problem.
Carelessness, ineptitude and ignorance on the part of the underpaid, under-experienced people who are doing things now.
I kind of think the target is now mobile devices rather than desktops.
They're both, and it makes no difference. As soon as I put the illumination up on my screen, the photo's brightness was fine. Same with the phone.
Contrary to you, I don't think people working at The Guardian are careless, inept and ignorant. Quite the opposite.
I meant that as a general comment on today’s state of e-journalism.
There's no such thing as "e-journalism". There's just journalism. Makes no difference if you write on a typewriter or on a computer, whether you publish it on paper or on an app. Good journalism is good journalism no matter the support. Same for bad journalism.
Now I'd say the same thing about photography, but I'd turn into one of those film vs e-photography debates we don't like here.
Has anyone else been noticing this? I'm seeing frequent examples lately of quite dark photography in mainstream media outlets and I'm wondering if there is a technical reason or if there is something else going on. This picture was made in broad daylight on a cloudless day and yet the histogram is skewed heavily toward blackness. I'm seeing this from multiple news sources. Often in the same story there will be a quite dark image like the one below, but then there will be an image with normal illumination which highlights the issue.
This pic is from Faith Ninivaggi/Reuters/The Guardian:
View attachment 396613
They're both, and it makes no difference. As soon as I put the illumination up on my screen, the photo's brightness was fine. Same with the phone.
Contrary to you, I don't think people working at The Guardian are careless, inept and ignorant. Quite the opposite.
I meant that as a general comment on today’s state of e-journalism.
When I searched for the photographer, there were a number of such muddy photos show up from various news sources - Guardian, Washington Post, etc. But the photos are atypical of that photographer. Is it possible the new agencies don't want to adjust the exposure or contrast settings of the photos? Reuters explicitly refuses to accept photos that have been processed from RAW and insists on only accepting the JPEGs the camera itself saves to the card, claiming that the latter is the least likely to distort the truth.
The New York Times
is not Reuters.
Digital photographers tend to want to avoid blowing highlights so may end up with something that looks underexposed. Levels adjustment easily clears it up. But if Reuters does not allow level adjustment, then they're stuck with a gloomy-looking photo. They seem to want straight-out-of-the-camera photos.
Has anyone else been noticing this? I'm seeing frequent examples lately of quite dark photography in mainstream media outlets and I'm wondering if there is a technical reason or if there is something else going on. This picture was made in broad daylight on a cloudless day and yet the histogram is skewed heavily toward blackness. I'm seeing this from multiple news sources. Often in the same story there will be a quite dark image like the one below, but then there will be an image with normal illumination which highlights the issue.
This pic is from Faith Ninivaggi/Reuters/The Guardian:
View attachment 396613
View attachment 396614
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?