• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Dark marks on the edge of negative - air bubbles?

Usagi

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 17, 2007
Messages
362
Location
Turku, Finla
Format
Multi Format
Hi,

recently I have had this kind of marks on some of my films.
I haven't yet tried to hunt out the reason but so far I am quite sure that mostly I have these when using Neopan 400 roll film developed in Pyrocat-HD.



Have tested with and without pre-wet. No difference.

My strongest suspects are either air bubbles or perhaps some remains of photo-flo or Tetenal Mirasol 2000 can cause these?

All films where I have seen these are developed with Pyrocat-HD 1:1:100 using partial standing method (first minute continuous agitation, then 3 inversions at each minute).

So before I waste precious film for systematic testing, I would like to hear if these marks look familiar to someone. It would save a lot of time and film.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,370
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Yes air bells, unmistakeable.

I add 3 drops of wetting agent to my Pyrocat HD and that totally eliminates the problem which is a hard water issue usually. I've posted images of visual test I did in the past with no lid on my tanks and without the wetting agent there was no way I could get rid of the problem.

Ian
 

DanielStone

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
3,114
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format
new baby in the family?

just out of curiosity, how do you like using pyrocat-hd for rollfilm?

I'm currently using TMY-2. but those marks look like airbells to me

-Dan
 
OP
OP

Usagi

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 17, 2007
Messages
362
Location
Turku, Finla
Format
Multi Format
Yes, new baby in the family

I like using pyrocat-HD for rollfilm really much. Still using Rodinal and XTOL for some films, but pyrocat-hd has become my main developer for rollfilms too (for sheet film's it has become already).
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,697
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I used to get those 20 years ago. Seeing them again reminds me why I started rotary processing B&W 20 years ago.
Thanks for reminding me; as there was a recent thread where I read people telling someone not to use a Jobo for B&W.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,370
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
I add about 3 drops per litre, it's important not to add too mush as that canl cause foaming.

A suggestion fill you dev tank with water add the spirals etc (no film) observe the air bells, then add just enough wetting agent to cut the surface tension, which releases the bubbles. I did that then also with some developer as I wanted to solve the problem once & for-all.

It's a problem that is more likely to happen with home brew devs with no sequestering/water softening agents, commercial devs usually have additives to help prevent thse problems. I'd never had a problem until I moved to Turkey but the water has a very jigh mineral content with a lot of calcium.

Ian
 

fschifano

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
Looks to me like you could have used just a little more developer in the tank, and the problem would not have appeared. Bubbles like this form at the top of the fluid column and can get stuck to the spirals of the reel. If the reel were just a little more deeply submerged, the bubbles wouldn't stick there.
 
OP
OP

Usagi

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 17, 2007
Messages
362
Location
Turku, Finla
Format
Multi Format

That's what I thought when I encountered the problem first time.
Since that, I have used additional 100ml per film (my Paterson tank says that 500ml is enough for one 120 roll but I use 600ml).
It didn't help. These marks are also on the films that are developed with bigger tank where only one film could have problem of not being deep enough in the developer.

Strangely the XTOL which I use too does not have any problems, so it's only the Pyrocat-HD (glycol based I suppose).


It seems that tap water can add a lot of unpredictable things to the film processing.
In my previous house, I had no problem.
The house before that (within same city), I had a lot of pin hole problems. Especially with D76 and Xtol with Delta-films. Never found any good solution.

And now at the different city - came the problem with pyrocat-HD :rolleyes:

The distilled water is too expensive for all developers, but perhaps I should boil something like 10 liter of water and keep always boiled water stored ready for use.
 

fschifano

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
How about agitation, especially during the first 30 seconds to 1 minute of development? Maybe not vigorous enough to dislodge the bubbles? I really don't think it's a water problem, but keeping some boiled water might help.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,370
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
My visual tests showed that even vigorous agitation left air-bubbles, one problem with over-doing the agitation is perversely it actually adds more.

Agfa did a lot of work on these problems in the 1930's and Patented a specific wetting agent, which gave minimal foaming, the issue is well over a 100 years old as Agfa mention ways to minimise the problems in a 1910 Handbook.

Commercial developers contain sequestering agents, sometimes EDTA or Sodium Tri-polyphosphate (old type Calgon) and a few also contain long chain wetting agents in very small quantities, and this is why problems are more like to arise when you mix your own developers from raw chemicals.

In my own case it's really only the water hear locally in Turkey that causes problems, and like Jukka that just happens to be with Pyrocat HD but it would happen with other formula as well.

Ian.

Ian
 

Janos

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
18
Location
Hobart Tasma
Format
35mm
I used to get those 20 years ago. Seeing them again reminds me why I started rotary processing B&W 20 years ago.
Thanks for reminding me; as there was a recent thread where I read people telling someone not to use a Jobo for B&W.
The problem that I found with rotary (continuous) processing for B&W film, is that with no standing time, the edge definition doesn't build up. Not really a handicap, but it's one of the nice enhancements of this kind of photography.
 

Janos

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
18
Location
Hobart Tasma
Format
35mm
Apart from these very good suggestions, I assume that you always give the tank a sharp rap on a hard surface immediately after adding developer? I'm sure you must be, as I've always assumed that this is standard practice. Generally guaranteed to dislodge all air bubbles, which seem to be more of a problem with plastic reels than stainless steel ones.
 

Andrew Moxom

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
4,888
Location
Keeping the
Format
Multi Format
I switched from Paterson tanks to metal tanks and reels and the problems went away completely. Add to that I actually agitate less now in an attempt to stop bubbles forming in the first place. As others have recommended, using wetting agent to your tanks might clear up symptoms. However, it is not always recommended as this can build up on the edges of the reels causing problems later down the line. Especially if you do not regularly clean your reels with super hot water and bleach! Tell me how I know this!!...
 
OP
OP

Usagi

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 17, 2007
Messages
362
Location
Turku, Finla
Format
Multi Format
Janos, yes I give sharp rap to a tank. Actually when I have poured the developer in the tank, I rap it three times and then begun the initial agitation of one minute, then rap again three times.

From that point, I rap once after each agitation sequence.

The air bubbles has never been problem before moving to new city. And at here, they occur only with Pyrocat-HD.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,734
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Get a block of hard rubber from an arts store and thump the tank on it. It will convey the shock without denting a metal tank or cracking a plastic tank.

Steve
 

erikg

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 10, 2003
Messages
1,444
Location
pawtucket rh
Format
Multi Format
Isn't it funny the problems some of us run into when others who are doing the same process do not? Maybe not funny in the ha ha sense. I had this issue years ago with stainless reels and I took the suggestion of adding some wetting agent to the developer. Three drops just like Ian says, the problem went away and has never returned. Was it the wetting agent? Maybe, and Ian's tests do seem to show a connection, but sometimes it seems to me that there is a certain amount of magical thinking involved. Even so I keep using the three drops. I've been using the same tanks and reels for something like 28 years and I've never had an issue that with wetting agent residue even though that is my last step before the film comes off the reel and into the drying cabinet. Nevertheless I'm sure the problem exists. Just all part of the fun and a little reminder that we are not so in control as we might like to think.
 

xisbrat

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
19
Format
35mm
Same bubble symptoms -- dark spots on edge of image

Very timely thread!
I just experienced the bubble symptoms when I recently started using a larger 1-liter ss tank (2 120 reels + 1 35mm reel for "filler reel"). I shoot Acros and use Rodinal 1:100 stand development, in which I try to be gentle in my agitation. I rap the tank firmly on a wood board after each inversion set. I guess I was either too gentle, or didn't wrap it hard enough. I also filled the tank near to the top, which may not have left enough room for the agitation motion to be effective. Soooo many variables!! This is my first use of the larger tank; using a smaller tank had no problems.

I'll adjust my process, and try the wetting solution if necessary.

Thanks. Here's a shot of the bubbles on the right edge.
 

Attachments

  • Acros-06.jpg
    120.3 KB · Views: 136
OP
OP

Usagi

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 17, 2007
Messages
362
Location
Turku, Finla
Format
Multi Format
My problem with bubbles is now gone
By testing with only reel in the tank filled with water (Paterson 4, 500ml). I quickly noted that about 0.5ml of photoflo was enough for removing a lot of bubbles from the reel.

As the 0.5ml per 500ml feeled a bit too much (1:1000 when photoflo's normal usage on final rinse is 1:600), I did test with two 120 films and one liter with 0.5ml photoflo added (1:2000).
Both films came out without any traces of bubbles.

Have used since when developing Neopan 400 films. I haven't encountered any problems so this seems to be really good advice!
Thanks to Ian!