Dageurreuxtype with Rolleiflex?

Leaving Kefalonia

H
Leaving Kefalonia

  • 0
  • 0
  • 28
Lightning Strike

A
Lightning Strike

  • 1
  • 2
  • 31
Scales / jommuhtree

D
Scales / jommuhtree

  • 0
  • 0
  • 34
3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 7
  • 7
  • 172

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,066
Messages
2,785,726
Members
99,793
Latest member
Django44
Recent bookmarks
0

Hamster

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
202
Format
Med. Format Pan
I am interested in making Dageurreuxtype, so am starting to gather the nesscessary chemicals, frames, silver sheets etc...

It is intended to be a long term project, so will probably take me a few years before I have the first results.

I have a rolleiflex with Plate back, has anyone had any success in using the rollei in producing dags? Am I completely barking up the wrong tree?
 

archphoto

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
960
Location
Holland and
Format
4x5 Format
My main question would be: fits the plate you intend to use (thickness) into the holder.

The other thing I can think of is that the Rolleiflex gives you very sharp pic's, not like the ones in the early day's of photography, so you will need a softar filter-lens.
Otherwise is the Rolleiflex just a camera with a lens and a shutter, so give it a try !

Peter
 

Jerevan

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Messages
2,258
Location
Germany/Sweden
Format
Large Format
The plate holder for the Rollei can be used either for film or glass plates. If you can use glassplates in a holder, it is possible to make Daguerreotypes. The dags would be very small and gemlike. A first try might be to make paper negatives with the plate holder to get a bit further along the way towards the real thing, while picking up the skills and material. Another would be to use glassplates with liquid emulsion.
 

Captain_joe6

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
195
Location
Portland, OR
Format
8x10 Format
I can vouch for the effectiveness of using liquid emulsion on glass and using it in-camera. Rocklamd's liquid light works well, but their tintype emulsion works even better.
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
Two things.
1) Many dags were very sharp and you don't need to soften them.
2) Most were also on the small side, Large was the exception.
 
OP
OP

Hamster

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
202
Format
Med. Format Pan
Proposed roadmap?

Thanks for all the input, it is getting a bit more encouraging.

I have been wanting to do dags for a while now, to me it embodies everything that is precious in analog photography. A photograph that is jewel like. I even took out a very technical book from the library to find out more from the process.

What would you proposed to be a sensible "roadmap" of skills I should acquire before I expose my first polished and fumed silverplate? Shall I attempt tintype, wet collidal or ambrotype first? Wet emulsion? Toning? Case making skills?

I have time so I can take slowly, I am hoping for a first attempt in 5 years or so. I have university level engineering and chemistry skills. I also worked in film based printing factory prepress and photomicrography professionally so hopefully I have the basics already.

The main thing is having a safe and isolated place to do the work, and that would probably come with time.
 

Jerevan

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Messages
2,258
Location
Germany/Sweden
Format
Large Format
I think John Barniers book Coming into Focus will provide you with some more ideas concerning dags and other early processes.
 

Marco B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
2,736
Location
The Netherla
Format
Multi Format
What would you proposed to be a sensible "roadmap" of skills I should acquire before I expose my first polished and fumed silverplate? Shall I attempt tintype, wet collidal or ambrotype first? Wet emulsion? Toning? Case making skills?

I have time so I can take slowly, I am hoping for a first attempt in 5 years or so. I have university level engineering and chemistry skills. I also worked in film based printing factory prepress and photomicrography professionally so hopefully I have the basics already.

It's a bit off-topic, but since you show interest in Daguerreotype and other historical processes, you may find this document worth reading:

"PHOTOGRAPHS FROM THE 19th CENTURY: A process identification guide" by William E.Leyshon

There is a section about Daguerreotype as well. Although this book does not cover the actual making of historical process type photos, it does give lots of interesting (technical) info, for example, there are even some electron-microscopic images of a Daguerreotype. Since you have a technical background, it should be an interesting read.

I put a link up to the freely downloadable PDF (from a university website) version of this book in the Books section of the APUG Web Links Portal here:

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

Scroll down to see it listed.

Marco
 

Shinnya

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
583
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
Hi,

If you really want to make Daguerreotype, I would simply start with Daguerreotype. They are quite different from the rest of the processes that you will not gain much.

There are few key points in making Daguerreotype as far as I understand:

1) Quality of plating
2) Polishing
3) Getting chemistry (especially Bromine)

We invited Takashi Arai for a demonstration this year, and I saw his entire process. Theses are key points in making successful plates and the most difficult parts to me. It is not easy to create the first acceptable plate but I am sure you will feel good if you make one.

We are running a daguerreotype workshop with him this fall. It would be a great occasion to learn from someone who is doing it already.

Warmly,
Tsuyoshi

What would you proposed to be a sensible "roadmap" of skills I should acquire before I expose my first polished and fumed silverplate? Shall I attempt tintype, wet collidal or ambrotype first? Wet emulsion? Toning? Case making skills?
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,546
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Two things.
1) Many dags were very sharp and you don't need to soften them.
2) Most were also on the small side, Large was the exception.

I'd like to concur with both of these points, and mention that shallow DOF, moving-subject-with-long-exposure and/or poor focus control should not be confused with "soft focus". If you like soft images, especially portraits (like me), I'd say go ahead and use a softar, soft-focus lens, etc. but please don't forget the dag technology itself has excellent resolution and no grain until you get to the molecular level.

Also, Thanks to Marco for reminding us of that link!
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
818
Location
San Bernardi
Format
8x10 Format
Hello Tsuyoshi,
I wonder if by a "Contemporary Approach" the instructer means a proces similar to the one taught at Photographer's Formulary. This process uses no mercury for development. Next to a real Dag, the best of these images look anemic.
Bill
 

Shinnya

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
583
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
Hi Bill,

Sorry for this late reply. I just notice this one.

The workshop will cover both. Mercury is definitely something Takashi practices on a regular basis.

Let me know if you have other questions.

Warmly,
Tsuyoshi
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom