Has anyone directly compared the Cosina-Voigtländer 21mm to the ZM 21mm 4.5 C Biogon?
I have the CV, which I find a generally good lens, but do notice vignetting and often wish the corners were sharper (o.k., my mental reference is the Leica R 19mm second version, which sets a pretty high standard).
Basically, I'd like to know if the (expensive) upgrade to the ZM would substantially improve those shortcomings.
Has anyone directly compared the Cosina-Voigtländer 21mm to the ZM 21mm 4.5 C Biogon?
I have the CV, which I find a generally good lens, but do notice vignetting and often wish the corners were sharper (o.k., my mental reference is the Leica R 19mm second version, which sets a pretty high standard).
Basically, I'd like to know if the (expensive) upgrade to the ZM would substantially improve those shortcomings.
I'm looking for a light & compact travel lens (which the CV 21 does do brilliantly), I don't really need f/2.8 with (my use of) a very wide-angle RF lens. When size & weight are no issue, I have my Leica 19mm....
BTW: I also have the Zeiss Distagon 18mm in Rolleiflex (SLR) mount; it is a completely different lens from the new ZM 18mm. While good, I expect the new ZM 18mm to be far better and have considered it.
Only the CV 21mm viewfinder also doubles nicely as a 15mm viewfinder. So stick with a 21mm + 15mm? 18mm substituting both?? 18mm + 15mm and fiddle with finders?? (Start chasing tail and eyes glaze over...) :confused: