It's several years out of production. Current professional papers are Endura Premium and metallic . Mass market it's Kodak Edge and Royal. To the best of my knowledge.I noticed this product on eBay
https://www.ebay.com/itm/200x-Kodak...=item2aa10a434c:g:D1YAAOSwFEpaj0c9:rk:10:pf:0
Does anyone know anything about this company? Are there similar products out there?
This is Kodak Supra Endura. The Supra version hasn't been made in years. Current Endura papers are Endura Premium and Endura Metallic.At that price, it's a risk I'm willing to take. Just placed an order. Thanks for the tip.
Will do. Probably won't be until this weekend or early next week. I blow 60 bucks in alcohol easily one night at the bars. If it doesn't work, no biggie.Please let us know about your results. I have been reluctant to buy rolls because I don’t use a lot of paper and don’t look forward to setting up a cutting rig in the dark.
There is Nordfoto in Germany; they cut Endura from rolls and sell it.
A friend of mine didn't have this issue though, so it must be me.
This was an impulse purchase. Now that reason has settled in, I realize now that this paper will not work for me. As someone pointed out above, this paper was designed for specific commercial applications, not the home enthusiast. It probably won't be usable due to the extreme contrast and saturation.Will do. Probably won't be until this weekend or early next week. I blow 60 bucks in alcohol easily one night at the bars. If it doesn't work, no biggie.
I have both and in varying degrees I seem to have the same fogging issue with both. It keeps puzzling me as I have excluded every factor apart from the paper, and you use paper which is likely (but not necessarily) from the same batch. Some further testing may be necessary...I bought a box last summer at Nordfoto.
If I recall correctly, then you have the mat N version whereas I have the glossy F version.. So it is likely a different batch. This is of course the downside of cutting a roll down by hand.
I have both and in varying degrees I seem to have the same fogging issue with both. It keeps puzzling me as I have excluded every factor apart from the paper, and you use paper which is likely (but not necessarily) from the same batch. Some further testing may be necessary...
I'm not sure what you're asking me. I'm not angry, if that's what you're asking me. I knew that it was possible the paper would be defective. I knew that the word "new" was meaningless in this context, as I knew the paper had been discontinued many moons ago. I had no problem spending 60 bucks to find out the condition of the paper. The ad does state there's a !00% money back guarantee if not satisfied. Are you saying that if I don't ask for my money back I'm encouraging other sellers to sell defective stuff?Do I understand you bought defective paper designated as "new" and will leave it at this? ("it's a risk I'm willing to take.")
That would mean encouraging sellers to sell defective stuff.
Yes,Are you saying that if I don't ask for my money back I'm encouraging other sellers to sell defective stuff?
...
At this point in my life, I've learned the hard way that there are many situations in life that just aren't worth the time and energy involved.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?