Solarize
Allowing Ads
Ed Sukach said:You are working with a client - someone who may - probably does - perceive images differently, so the only advice I could give is to work with them.
Ryan McIntosh said:Personally, I use irregular mat sizes for all images for several reason.
The first reason is I feel that for my 8x10 prints, 14x17 looks the best. 11x14 is to small and 16x20 is to big.
Second, I use odd sized mat's so the buyer HAS to have the print custom framed! If the person gets a standard sized matted print, they can very easy go to Walmart and pick up some crummy gold plastic frame to put your beautiful print it, which in result is degrading to your work.
If the buyer is forced to have the print customed framed, the framer will take into consideration how the frame will match the artwork and custom frames are usually more high quality.
So anyways, I suggest only doing odd mat sizes.
Ryan McIntosh
www.RyanMcIntosh.net
Solarize said:...I think I might specify the overall matt size I would prefer or tend to use (along with the print size) and give the customer the option of requesting a smaller matt should they prefer.
mark said:This has to be the most arrogant thing I have ever read.
mark said:A-the print does not belong to him when he sells it.
B-The person who bought the print KNOWS how they want to display it
C-He assumes he KNOWS better than they, how they should present THEIR print.
It is the print that means something not the frame job.
Smacks of extreme arrogance to me. We were not talking about the content of the photograph. The image should carry it not the frame job. If someone notices the frame then the image has failed. It should have the same impact in a walmart frame as it does in a "professional" frame job. Of course this is how I feel, and you may think the frame is an integral part of the overall impact of the image.
t_nunn said:Sounds like a reasonable compromise. Just out of curiosity, what size matt borders are you going to have, is the print going to be centered?
mark said:If someone notices the frame then the image has failed.
Depends who the "noticer" is. Fresh from a session of cutting your own mats and framing. the matting and framing - and the effect it has on the presentation - may well be the focus of attention.mark said:... If someone notices the frame then the image has failed.
mark said:A-the print does not belong to him when he sells it.
B-The person who bought the print KNOWS how they want to display it
C-He assumes he KNOWS better than they, how they should present THEIR print.
It is the print that means something not the frame job.
Smacks of extreme arrogance to me. We were not talking about the content of the photograph. The image should carry it not the frame job. If someone notices the frame then the image has failed. It should have the same impact in a walmart frame as it does in a "professional" frame job. Of course this is how I feel, and you may think the frame is an integral part of the overall impact of the image.
mark said:Maybe you should give your client and others credit for maybe, possibly, knowing a thing or two about frames and proper framing proceedures. I happen to be a very accomplished framer. Happily frame my stuff and other folk's stuff. Your assumption that I needed to be educated about frames and proper framing proceedures says alot. DO you make this naive assumption about your clients as well? I stand by my original post.
kjsphoto said:Give it a rest.
Geez, you are not the only one with an opinion. Ryan makes perfect sense. I personally used to FRAME also and I do not offer my prints in standard sizes as I want my clients to go to a print shop and have a nice frame on the image and not a cheap Wal-Mart or Costco $5 frame on the artwork to cheapen the work that is presented.
Also by offering odd size mats you help support the small frames shops instead of the large corporation that are putting mom and pop shops out of business.
I think Ryans point is completely valid and not arrogant in any matter.
Man oh man is it the time of the month again or what?
Solarize said:I've just printed some portraits for a customer (6 X 7's of their baby) and part of the deal is that I matt them. Logically I should probably go with a standard size matt so they don't need to be custom framed, something I can do, but I can't help thinking that an irregular matt size might look better.
Is it unethical or particularly unusual to go with an irregular size, essentially forcing custom framing? (consider likelihood of me being the one to do it).
I wouldn't use irregular sizing just to force the extra cost of framing it specially. An artistic, not business decision will be the deciding factor, but I am just not too sure what size to go with.
Is it wrong to use an irregular size matt?
What size would people here matt a 5X7 to? 11X14 seems perhaps the best with 8X10 looking a little small. Maybe I'm being too fussy.
In any instance I would like to standardize on a size as I want to get a fair bit of glass cut and it'll be expensive for me to keep going back for different sizes.
Thanks for any opinions
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?