Curves Settings for Digital Negatives - Darkroom Cookbook

Field #6

D
Field #6

  • 1
  • 0
  • 17
Hosta

A
Hosta

  • 4
  • 0
  • 26
Water Orchids

A
Water Orchids

  • 1
  • 0
  • 21
Life Ring

A
Life Ring

  • 1
  • 0
  • 22
Fisherman's Rest

A
Fisherman's Rest

  • 7
  • 2
  • 58

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,899
Messages
2,766,604
Members
99,500
Latest member
Neilmark
Recent bookmarks
1

Dan Rainer

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2024
Messages
25
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
Multi Format
I'm not experienced with digital negatives, but I picked up a copy of the new edition of The Darkroom Cookbook and there was a very detailed introduction to the process. Overall, it was very informative, but I have one point of confusion.

Steve Anschell recommends building curves for different processes using the curves tool set to "Pinkment/Ink %" mode. This gives input/output on a scale of 0/0 to 100/100. However, on the following page, he lists example process curve coordinates from a variety of different photographers—some of which extend to 255/255. Underneath, he even mentions that the scale is 0/0 to 255/255.

Are all of these curve coordinates built for the "Light (0-255)" curve mode? Or just the ones that explicitly extend past 100? Would I get skewed results if I use the "Light (0-255)" mode for all of them?
 

Attachments

  • DCB.jpg
    DCB.jpg
    722.9 KB · Views: 24
  • Curves.png
    Curves.png
    55.3 KB · Views: 19

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,444
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Are all of these curve coordinates built for the "Light (0-255)" curve mode? Or just the ones that explicitly extend past 100?

I assume the latter. Otherwise Christina's curves would be way weird. Note also that it's only Christina's curves that appear to use the 0-100 scale; all the others are 0-255.

Would I get skewed results if I use the "Light (0-255)" mode for all of them?

Yes, you would get dramatically different results than intended.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,235
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I've added a reference to the Darkroom Cookbook to your thread title. Looks like @Steve Anchell hasn't been here on Photrio since September, but you necer know ...
 

fgorga

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
748
Location
New Hampshire
Format
Multi Format
I've been making digital negatives for a long time (15+ years) and have never run into a practitioner who uses anything but the 0-255 (light) scale.

That said, a careful reading of the footnote to the attached table says that these are all 0-255 curves.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,444
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
That said, a careful reading of the footnote to the attached table says that these are all 0-255 curves.

I read that and concluded it must be an erratum. Just look at the series of Christina's numbers; they wouldn't make sense on a 255 scale. The first one would look like this on base 255:
1748324933845.png

No way.
 

revdoc

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
286
Format
35mm
If I'm working in 16 bits (and I always am), GIMP will present everything in percent. So all my curves are specified 0 to 100.

Anyway, it doesn't look like a mystery to me. Christina's numbers just need to be multiplied by 2.55 to bring them into line with the others.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,444
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
If I'm working in 16 bits (and I always am), GIMP will present everything in percent. So all my curves are specified 0 to 100.
Yeah, that's a bit of a quirk in Gimp. If you go back to 8 bit mode, by default the curves dialog will become 255-based. I think this can be modified somewhere.
 

Carnie Bob

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2023
Messages
346
Location
Toronto , Ont Canada
Format
4x5 Format
I've been making digital negatives for a long time (15+ years) and have never run into a practitioner who uses anything but the 0-255 (light) scale.

That said, a careful reading of the footnote to the attached table says that these are all 0-255 curves.

I have only used LAB , never ever considered RGB for reading numbers, I find LAB is much the same as a colour enlarger that I cut my teeth on .
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,444
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
I find LAB is much the same as a colour enlarger that I cut my teeth on .

Makes good sense; you have two color axes and one density axis after all.

Not sure about others here but when I am setting up my process we use a 100 scale chart to read output vs input and adjust.
The number of patches you measure is one thing; the numeric values on the curve is another. The latter really isn't that important; it's very much a potato/potato situation. Btw, I just started playing with Argyll CMS this weekend which allows for enormous flexibility in creating test patterns; I made a (for me) very convenient 160-step pattern that prints on ca. 4x5" and reads easily with an i1Pro.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom