I did a darkroom workshop on bleaching with Potassium Ferricyanide several years ago and all the participants used Ilford MGIV FB. In my experience this paper responded well to the bleaching. What was the problem with this paper that you read about? I've done a bit of bleaching with Adox MCC and Adox Variotone WT recently and that worked well too. But I only use bleaching very sporadically. I have no experience with the newer Ilford Classic FB papers.
Menno
Technique, dilution matter way more than brand of paper. Based on a thousand screw-ups, I can't blame any of them on the paper.
Smaller silver grain locally, not just less of em, so yes warmer, though sometimes more apparent after toning. It's a big practical problem for me,
so I regard bleaching as a last resort. If it just adds a tad of sparkle to tiny highlights, maybe nobody will notice, but anything bigger and one needs
the right paper and developer to hide one's hand.
I've had problems with split-toning of areas that have previously been bleached as well as times when rather strong bleaching of an area resulted in a tonal shift. I use local bleaching fairly regularly, and this really only happens when the bleaching is fairly extensive. I now keep a close eye on bleached areas when selenium toning and use a more dilute toning solution just to avoid this. Prints that change tone after bleaching just get tossed.
That said, I find bleaching a good tool and find that all the papers I regularly use respond just fine to a ferricyanide/bromide rehalogenating bleach. I use Galerie, Foma graded and VC, Slavich graded papers, Adox MC-110 and a few others; all fairly neutral-tone on as white a base as I can get.
Best,
Doremus
Bleaching has no effect on the wrmth if it's purely being used as a reducer.
Ian
I used a dilute plain potassium ferricyonide bleach bath with ilford rd paper for maybe 30-40 mins and ended up with a nice yellowy golden tone in highlights (which i then managed to near obliterate by trying to bleach lightest highlights back out in stock bleach for a couple of seconds....) Tim Rudman's Master Printing book has an example in it of a pseudo lith effect and colour shift using a long dilute bath
That's a two different reason for bleaching, first is for reduction, the second for toning, you don't want a shift in image colour for reduction, where as that's the goal with toning.
In both cases how the image is printed will have a significant effect on how quickly the bleach works. I'm talking about the contrast and tonal range rather than the make/type of paper.
Ian
I used a dilute plain potassium ferricyonide bleach bath with ilford rd paper for maybe 30-40 mins and ended up with a nice yellowy golden tone in highlights (which i then managed to near obliterate by trying to bleach lightest highlights back out in stock bleach for a couple of seconds....) Tim Rudman's Master Printing book has an example in it of a pseudo lith effect and colour shift using a long dilute bath
The fact that dilute bleach will act as both a toner and reducer at same time over an admittedly substantial time would suggest to me one could also experience a colour shift when trying to use it purely as a reducer (perhaps if the bleach is too dilute or a particular emulsion?). It might be helpful to know what strength and for how long people are using bleach before when they experience a colour shift
Hi Analog65 - its in the master printing book not the lith book. It's very easy to do tho if you dont have a copy to hand. In Ilford multigrade RC i got it to turn a nice golden yellow - Tim's example looks more like a copper tone effect.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?