- Joined
- May 23, 2006
- Messages
- 341
- Format
- Medium Format
The holders are tough though.
I can't believe that Fidelity or Lisco isn't producing them. There's huge pent up demand for them. To just switch over to 13x18cm with no warning and no buildup of 5x7 inventory is just staggeringly stupid business practice.
I can't believe that Fidelity or Lisco isn't producing them. There's huge pent up demand for them. To just switch over to 13x18cm with no warning and no buildup of 5x7 inventory is just staggeringly stupid business practice.
A quick look at freestyle turned up:
Efke PL25
Efke PL50
Efke PL100
Berger BPF200
Ilford FP4+
Ilford HP5+
Kodak Tri-X 320
Arista EDU Ultra 100
Arista EDU Ultra 200
Foma Fomapan 100
Foma Fomapan 200
5x7 holders are a lot more difficult to obtain than the film. The only ones I've been able to find new are the Shen Haos at $66.95 apiece, which I refuse to pay. Battered, dusty, broken 5x7 holders are going on ebay for as much as $40.00 apiece. This is because B&H and Calumet sell only 13x18cm holders and not 5x7.
If you're primarily interested in color films, the availability of 13x18cm film might be more important to you than 5x7. Ektachrome 64T, for example, is available now in 8x10, 4x5, 4x5 Readyloads and 13x18cm sheets. No 5x7.
I've also pondered the 5x7 format but in my head, I can see the manufacturers doing away with 5x7 and only having 4x5 and 8x10.
My reasoning for my statement is that one sheet of 8x10 makes 4 sheets of 4x5. Both sizes that are being used.
As far as I know, and I have no idea what size film is originally made in and cut from, 5x7 is it's own run?
Thanks Nick for clarifying.
As for the 5x7 format, I am holding out for a Canham 4x5/5x7, this way I have the best of both worlds.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?