• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

crooked landscapes!

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,983
Messages
2,848,399
Members
101,577
Latest member
Ostrevino
Recent bookmarks
0
He is young and has much to learn.
 
I can't tell if you're being facetious or not...


Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk

I think Stone may be spending too much time around models:whistling:
 
sounds like a picture of a brick wall might be in order... to determine if the film gate is out of wack with the viewfinder?
 
Yes, this is kinda what I thought. Maybe others can speak to why a level necessarily corrects the issue?

Mark

It doesn't neccesarily correct the issue, especially if it isn't calibrated to the filmplane.But a lot of folks seem to think it's magical! By this I mean the bubble being centered when the filmplane is perfectly vertical and level left to right. If you are photographing a building (for instance) which is perfectly plumb, level, and rectilinear, just true the filmplane with your level. But what if the buliding isn't perfectly plumb? This is where the gridlines save you. :smile:
 
Unless one is doing science there comes a point where being correct doesn't necessarily make the best picture. That's where art comes in.
 
Unless one is doing science there comes a point where being correct doesn't necessarily make the best picture. That's where art comes in.

That's why I've been suggesting that the OP find somebody with a view camera and go play.

One truly fun aha moment I had was when I figured out I could, in the right scene, skew the perception of how tall a mountain looks and make a more interesting print by manipulating the tilt (front to back pitch) of the back to get an effect similar to what a painter like Georgia O'Keefe could get and still get a visually level horizon by manipulating the tilt of the film right or left (roll).

With a bit of experience using a LF camera and then seeing some of O'Keefe's paintings that were next to her own photos of the same scene it suddenly clicked for me and opened a whole new set of opportunities. One where level by the bubble isn't even relevant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's why I've been suggesting that the OP find somebody with a view camera and go play.

One truly fun aha moment I had was when I figured out I could, in the right scene, skew the perception of how tall a mountain looks and make a more interesting print by manipulating the tilt (front to back pitch) of the back to get an effect similar to what a painter like Georgia O'Keefe could get and still get a visually level horizon by manipulating the tilt of the film right or left (roll).

With a bit of experience using a LF camera and then seeing some of O'Keefe's paintings that were next to her own photos of the same scene it suddenly clicked for me and opened a whole new set of opportunities. One where level by the bubble isn't even relevant.

Agree completely. Even if you don't stay with it long a view camera can teach you so much, to say nothing of the upside down image, a revelation in itself.
 
Not sure I didn't miss something here. All my LF kits have a small level. That way if the compositional need arises I can level the camera. If it doesn't arise, the instrument can stay in the bag. I'm certainly not going to use it for every photo. Or not use it for every photo.

It's quite portable and light weight and not much of a bother to carry, after all.

Ken
 
You didn't miss anything Ken.

I'm not suggesting that levels have no value, just that they only provide someplace "close" to start correcting from. Levels can't see the exceptions in front of the camera.
 
Could be the builder's fault...:wink:

If we are going to go through the trouble, why not just go to the top and blame THE "Architect" .... If you know what I mean... White beard, probably senile which is why it's crooked... Haha


Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Could be the builder's fault...:wink:

When I was a kid way back when, living in So Cal, my brother actually spotted a new office building from the freeway that he said was crooked. Turns out he was right, and he was not the only onle that noticed, not long after that the newspaper did a story about the building.

Builder's fault as I remember.
 
If we are going to go through the trouble, why not just go to the top and blame THE "Architect" .... If you know what I mean... White beard, probably senile which is why it's crooked... Haha

Because it's probably the builder that's crooked! :whistling:
 
The OP uses 35mm. None of my 35s have anyplace to put a level except the accessory shoe - and only one of my 5 35s has an accessory shoe.:whistling:

The base, the back, the front of the lens against the filter ring, the side of the camera?
 
The base, the back, the front of the lens against the filter ring, the side of the camera?

I'm talking of a permanent mounting, like the one on my Linhof STIV where it's built into the body. There just isn't room on a 35. I never use the level though, I prefer to use the gridlines I put on the GG. I do use the two tubular bubble levels built into the tripod head to set the tripod up level.
 
I prefer the grid lines too.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom