Creating a larger fiber print on different paper from a smaller RC print timings. Workflow options with split grade printing?

Sonatas XII-82 (Farms)

A
Sonatas XII-82 (Farms)

  • 1
  • 1
  • 76
portrait

A
portrait

  • 7
  • 1
  • 103
Transatlantic.JPG

A
Transatlantic.JPG

  • 0
  • 0
  • 91
Sea.JPG

A
Sea.JPG

  • 4
  • 1
  • 88

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,228
Messages
2,804,631
Members
100,174
Latest member
Toesoe
Recent bookmarks
1

ChrisArslain

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2024
Messages
27
Location
Washington
Format
Multi Format
Let's say I wanted to go from a Ilford 8X10 RC final print to a larger fiber Print (still Ilford) and I made the RC print using split grade filtering. What is/would be your preferred workflow? Would you use an F-stop timer with an attached light meter like the one from Darkroom Automation? Paper is expensive, and I am considering this workflow for my home darkroom so I only use fiber for final prints (or at least use a lot less). Is it possible with split grade printing? Is it all just a waste of time and make some new test prints?
If anyone has good book recommendations for this or practice with these programmable timers, i would appreciate the input. This is the kind of stuff you worry about when your darkroom isn't finished. Thanks all! 🖖
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
5,001
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
A densitometer will tell you more than time wasted on split grade. An understanding of exposure relationships between different enlargement sizes (or something like an Ilford EM-10) will help too, as will learning where reciprocity kicks in. Don't trust RC & FB real-world optimal exposures to be exactly the same.

If you have a pretty good idea of the characteristics of your neg, a test strip (or two) at size should be all you'll need. If you are trying to claim that'll be unaffordable, then frankly you should cut your cloth to suit your pocket, rather than needing to churn out pointless volumes of 20x24's.
 

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,713
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
You can use split grade printing with Ilford fiber paper. You can also cut a larger sheet to make a test print of a representative area or more than one of various areas. Of course do them at enlarged level.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,988
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
You will probably discover that even if you stay with the same paper - RC and RC , or FB and FB - you will find that it is often desirable to adjust your print exposures slightly when you go up to a significantly larger size. There are subjective and objective factors that lead to this result.
But a good quality 8x10 print on RC, coupled with detailed notes about your contrast, burning and dodging choices can certainly help reduce the amount of new tests you need.
An EM-10 or similar meter that helps you match the light intensity at the baseboard for a reference mid-tone area will also help, as well as a workflow that has you using middle to smaller aperture openings for the smaller print.
You will also need to build some experience with your choice of paper pairs. The first few prints will tell you much about how future prints will need to be approached - something like the FB always needing 30% more exposure, plus an additional half grade contrast for the shadows, or something similar.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,899
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Ive use a very old F stop meter, not a timer, it worked pretty well, and an reflective densitometer for very large prints 16X20 and 20X24, they all worked to find a starting point, but in end it was always a number of small test strips allowed to dry down to determine burning and dodging. I have used spit grade printing on Foma FB 8X10 and 11X14 and found that it did reduce some of the burning and dodging but not all. The trick with FB is get a good dry down, for test strips I use the microwave. If you want to print glossy with FB then you need a set of ferrotype plates and allow the test stripd to dry on the plates.
 

mmerig

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
220
Location
Teton Valley
Format
Medium Format
There a few options. One is to get a smaller size of the larger fiber paper you plan on using, and use that as a test sheet. Of course you can also cut-up the larger fiber paper for test sheets/strips. The smaller paper trial could be the most economical way if you only do occasional printing. For lots of prining on various paper types, something like the RH Designs Analyzer Pro would work. Several paper types can be calibrated and the resulting settings can be switched to. So if you find good exposure and contrast settings on say an RC paper, you then switch to the fiber paper setting and the exposure and filter settings will show up. This all assumes that the paper types are already calibrated. It takes about 30 minutes to calibrate a paper type once you get the hang of of it. If you spend say 30 minutes or more to get a print just right, and do this maybe once a week or less, the AP Pro is probably not the way to go. So much depends on how much you print and the economics of smaller papers versus springing for the RHD Analyzer Pro.

The Analyzer Pro does not handle split-grade printing settings so automatically, but the first filter step can be switched to as with simple, one-grade printing, and the curve values that come with the two papers could be used to get the proper timing for the second filter value. I rarely ever use split grade printing unless the dodging or burning-in steps use different filters. The in-between filter grades that SP printing affords is not worth the extra trouble to me. There is no other advantage to SP printing (there are posts about this). Split grade printing along with switching papers makes the RHD AP Pro method complicated, but I think it is workable and again, the AP Pro pays for itself faster if you print a lot.

The RHD Stop-clock along with an exposure meter will handle split printing, along with dodging and burning steps. But I don't think it has paper calibration like the AP, so switching papers would require starting over, and storing those steps as with the first type of paper.

Ralph Lambrecht and Chris Woodhouse's book "Way Beyond Monchrome" is a good source. Ctein's Post Exposure is good too, and I think it is free on-line.
 

AZD

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Messages
361
Location
SLC, UT
Format
35mm
Whether it is “correct” or not, I would do this:

- Establish the difference between exposure and contrast adjustment for “equivalent” prints at the same size on both papers. Something smallish, like 5x7 or 8x10. This is the key to understanding the characteristics of your materials.

- Calculate the exposure increase needed for your intended dimensions vs your small print. For instance, 8x10 to 16x20 spreads the same light over twice the linear dimension but 4x the area; 4x the light is two stops exposure increase.

- Make test strips at this exposure to see if you’re in the ballpark. If yes, make a full size test print and evaluate.

- Make changes as desired.

If you can do this with only two sheets that would be impressive. I suspect you will want to fine tune the larger image several times.

FWIW, I did this when I acquired just two sheets of 8x10 Portriga #3 and wanted a 4x5 and an 8x10 of the same image. Baseline dodge/burn workflow established with Ilford RC Multigrade, differences noted and calculated while making the 4x5 on Portriga. Final 8x10 - my one and only chance - is very satisfactory.
 
OP
OP
ChrisArslain

ChrisArslain

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2024
Messages
27
Location
Washington
Format
Multi Format
Thanks all for your views on this. Exactly the discussion, tips, and sources I was looking for, all of the opinions above were valuable. I didn't mean to imply that economics was a limiting factor, only it would be nice to save paper. I did get a little sticker shock when I put some boxes of fiber in my Freestyle cart!

I'm new to this forum and have always printed without split grade until recently trying it on a couple prints that ended up pretty good, but I probably could have gotten the same from regular and it took more test strips getting the hang of it. It's evident that the consensus here is that split grade printing is not worth it. I'm going to give those books a read. Th AP sounds like a great a device and I'll check that out. 🖖
There a few options. One is to get a smaller size of the larger fiber paper you plan on using, and use that as a test sheet. Of course you can also cut-up the larger fiber paper for test sheets/strips. The smaller paper trial could be the most economical way if you only do occasional printing. For lots of prining on various paper types, something like the RH Designs Analyzer Pro would work. Several paper types can be calibrated and the resulting settings can be switched to. So if you find good exposure and contrast settings on say an RC paper, you then switch to the fiber paper setting and the exposure and filter settings will show up. This all assumes that the paper types are already calibrated. It takes about 30 minutes to calibrate a paper type once you get the hang of of it. If you spend say 30 minutes or more to get a print just right, and do this maybe once a week or less, the AP Pro is probably not the way to go. So much depends on how much you print and the economics of smaller papers versus springing for the RHD Analyzer Pro.

The Analyzer Pro does not handle split-grade printing settings so automatically, but the first filter step can be switched to as with simple, one-grade printing, and the curve values that come with the two papers could be used to get the proper timing for the second filter value. I rarely ever use split grade printing unless the dodging or burning-in steps use different filters. The in-between filter grades that SP printing affords is not worth the extra trouble to me. There is no other advantage to SP printing (there are posts about this). Split grade printing along with switching papers makes the RHD AP Pro method complicated, but I think it is workable and again, the AP Pro pays for itself faster if you print a lot.

The RHD Stop-clock along with an exposure meter will handle split printing, along with dodging and burning steps. But I don't think it has paper calibration like the AP, so switching papers would require starting over, and storing those steps as with the first type of paper.

Ralph Lambrecht and Chris Woodhouse's book "Way Beyond Monchrome" is a good source. Ctein's Post Exposure is good too, and I think it is free on-line.

Whether it is “correct” or not, I would do this:

- Establish the difference between exposure and contrast adjustment for “equivalent” prints at the same size on both papers. Something smallish, like 5x7 or 8x10. This is the key to understanding the characteristics of your materials.

- Calculate the exposure increase needed for your intended dimensions vs your small print. For instance, 8x10 to 16x20 spreads the same light over twice the linear dimension but 4x the area; 4x the light is two stops exposure increase.

- Make test strips at this exposure to see if you’re in the ballpark. If yes, make a full size test print and evaluate.

- Make changes as desired.

If you can do this with only two sheets that would be impressive. I suspect you will want to fine tune the larger image several times.

FWIW, I did this when I acquired just two sheets of 8x10 Portriga #3 and wanted a 4x5 and an 8x10 of the same image. Baseline dodge/burn workflow established with Ilford RC Multigrade, differences noted and calculated while making the 4x5 on Portriga. Final 8x10 - my one and only chance - is very satisfactory.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,988
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
It's evident that the consensus here is that split grade printing is not worth it.

I hope you don't get that from my post! :smile:
I use split grade techniques for just about all my prints - some rely more on them, while others rely less on them, but they are important to how I work.
So for clarity, the initial print on 8x10 RC uses them, and the challenge is merely how to scale up the print and adjust for the differences between the emulsions and support when moving to larger FB paper.
I wouldn't know how to proceed if I intended to not use split grade with one type and size of paper, and then use it for the other size and type of paper.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,466
Format
8x10 Format
I'd just skip to the chase and start out with to-scale test strips with the same final FB paper you intend to use. I have a variety of special meters to facilitate color printing, but don't use a single one of them for black and white work. I hypothetically could; but it would just complicate an otherwise straightforward procedure.
Even each different kind of Ilford paper has its own personality. It's pretty hard to predict exact results aesthetically switching from one type to another.

Your time would be better spent becoming highly familiar through practice with a single paper. Why set up more hurdles?
 
Last edited:

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,696
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
I agree 100% with Drew. The shortcuts never are.
I certainly wouldn't go buying a densitometer or any other fancy timers.
Use one sheet of the same final paper for various test strips. Then make more final prints than you need in case you crease one or find
a flaw in the paper once it's dry.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,988
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
One of the problems about asking this sort of question of the more experienced darkroom printers here is that it is somewhat difficult for us to put ourselves in the position of being less experienced :smile:.
It makes sense for us to start with the bigger paper, because we have less to learn from the process. We probably gain more information from each test and even from just visually examining the negative itself and/or a contact proof of it than someone will who has less experience.
So I'm not sure that recommending against starting with less expensive paper makes as much sense for the less experienced.
If you work out how you want the print to turn out on the economy paper, you can apply the information to working with the larger FB paper.
I personally restrict my printing to RC almost exclusively, but I do gain benefit from printing small - say 5x7 - and then living for a bit with that print before I make my target 11x14.
 
OP
OP
ChrisArslain

ChrisArslain

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2024
Messages
27
Location
Washington
Format
Multi Format
I too usually change my mind about a print over a couple days too. Thanks Matt. It's super interesting to hear all the opinions. I think I just asked bunch of chefs how to cook a chicken (and then apply that to steak), so I get it.
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,285
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
I think I just asked bunch of chefs how to cook a chicken (and then apply that to steak)...
"Go not to the Elves for advice, for they will say both yes and no."

Boil the steak in a stock pot for 2 hours. Truss the chicken and saute it in a chafing dish with a bit of butter and a splash of Cognac. Or the other way around, as you wish.

On to the original question -

I do this quite often, starting with 5x7 RC and going on to 8x10 or 11x14 FB. With the price of Ilford's fine art paper one would have to be a wealthy fool not to.

With the Darkroom Automation timer and meter, and a Dektronics densitometer (highly recommended), it is rather easy to nail the large print on the first try. Maybe I'll write an application note on the procedure.

Split grade techniques aren't suited for this task, though I am sure someone, somewhere, has figured out how to do it and does.

I advise chopping up a sheet of FB into 4x5" or so test coupons to confirm the base exposure, filtration and any dodges and burns before exposing a whole sheet at $10 a pop (Art 300, 16x20). If this is commercial work, though, the $10 is pretty trivial in comparison to other costs - but then you wouldn't be asking advice on the matter but giving it.
 
Last edited:

mmerig

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
220
Location
Teton Valley
Format
Medium Format
In my post (#6), I did not consider that you were making the fiber print bigger, so the RHD AP system I described would be more complicated (I assumed the same size final print). You would have to use the same enlarger height on the 8 by 10 RC paper that you need for the larger print, and use a representative area of the larger print to get the new exposure and contrast close. The paper calibration incorporates dry-down.

As others said, a test strip may be the simplest way. But with some experience, you could print the representative area and make a good guess if it just needs to be tweaked rather than making a test strip. Knowing the relative magnification for the two prints gives you the exposure factor increase for the larger print. so even if you don't use a meter at all, and get your exposure with the test strip, you'll be close to the proper exposure for the bigger one using the factor. Like a 2x increase in magnification means 2 stops more exposure, e.g. 8 by 10 to 16 by 20 is 2 stops. Contrast might change a little bit too. There are posts about this.
 

MARTIE

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
291
Format
Multi Format
I too usually change my mind about a print over a couple days too. Thanks Matt. It's super interesting to hear all the opinions. I think I just asked bunch of chefs how to cook a chicken (and then apply that to steak), so I get it.

Very well put!

If you're finding it's taking too long or you're using too much paper getting to your final print, then I'm sure there's something to win here -without the need to necessarily use splitgrade.

If this is the case, perhaps you could share something of your current methodology. Or any dilemmas you're facing. Or even some test strips and sample prints.

Alternatively, it may just be a matter of 'printing hours'.
 

Carnie Bob

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2023
Messages
422
Location
Toronto , Ont Canada
Format
4x5 Format
When I teach my new assistants how to print I do not worry about the size of print they are working on , the workflow and final process is basically the same in our darkroom for 11 x 14 prints and or 30. x 40 inch prints. The main difference is learning how to handle the paper in the tray, having enough chemistry in the tray to easily cover the paper being used and understanding you may only get one stellar print done each day.
In our lab we split contrast print every print. I also like others above have mentioned use one paper fb, (we only us RC for contact sheets) use Ilfords steps for processing and washing prints, and take your time and above all have fun.
 

Carnie Bob

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2023
Messages
422
Location
Toronto , Ont Canada
Format
4x5 Format
I also should mention when working with certain photographers , that require large prints or want to see test prints we will make a 16 x 20 print , let the prints dry and then
sit down with the photographer and go over the look of the print. We mark up the print if adjustments are to me made and really only the contrast split balance and where we are going to dodge and burn is important to note, we then throw the test print in the washer and for the larger print match the density and then do the final. We just finished over 400 large fb prints for Larry Towell and this is how we did it, granted it took us a year to do this but its how it was done. No densitometers or anylizers required.
 

Reginald S

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2022
Messages
49
Location
Germany
Format
Large Format
It's evident that the consensus here is that split grade printing is not worth it.

I really can't see evidence nor consensus here.
Split grade printing is worth every penny.


I'm not sure that recommending against starting with less expensive paper makes as much sense for the less experienced.


That's what I did: Starting with cheap Fomaspeed RC paper for learning the basics of printing.
But I didn't feel good in fiddling with small papersizes. So I cut my 12x16" sheets down for test stripes of certain areas since.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,466
Format
8x10 Format
Well, if one is not using "split grade" paper, or VC, what are they using? Graded papers are nearly extinct.
Of course, one can pedal a bicycle using only one gear if they want, although it might not be very efficient that way.

That doesn't mean one has to routinely differentially expose VC paper in "split" mode using hard B vs G filters, or M vs Y. There are many instances when I simply use basic "white" light, because the negative is so well matched to the paper that it almost prints itself. But when supplemental techniques are needed, they are there; and I do know how to use them.

As a commercial printer, working with other people's negatives, Bob is in a somewhat different situation. I had a similar scenario when paid to make the most of antique negatives, prior to modern digital restoration techniques. The more tools in your toolbox, the better, even if you only rarely use certain of them.
 
Last edited:

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,285
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
It isn't a matter of "To split-grade or not to split-grade, that is the conundrum."

The problem here is matching the mid-tone contrast of the original and the larger print. Split grade works best to find the grade of paper that fits an image's ZI-ZIX spread. For matching, say, ZIII-ZVI it won't work very well. (I'm sure someone has figured out how and I would be interested in finding out how they did it.)

It is possible to find the new exposure and VC filter when moving between papers and image sizes without test strips, split grade or not. It is even possible to do it without an enlarging meter or f-Stop timer - blasphemy, I know.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,466
Format
8x10 Format
Well, you've got your angle, Nicholas, and for some, your techniques might prove useful. So by all means, promote them. You'll deservedly get some followers.

But for myself, I can completely ignore all the archaic grade talk, even all the Zonie jargon, and not bother to apply any meters (even though I own some very expensive ones), and skip straight to the test strips. Faster, easier. And I work with multiple light sources - Blue-green cold light, additive RGB halogen colorheads, and a more typical CMY subtractive commercial colorhead.

I do know about midtone readings, especially in reference to color printing; but even there, test strips are critical.
 
OP
OP
ChrisArslain

ChrisArslain

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2024
Messages
27
Location
Washington
Format
Multi Format
Well I'm glad there is not a consensus here on split grade and sorry for the late response (Oasis concert out of town). I definitely would not call myself unexperienced with darkroom printing but I am no pro - just always did the traditional method and by feel / test strips (no meters) and I just started dabbling with split grade. I know you all have done the testing so I wanted to check in before I throw myself deep into an experimental rabbit hole (with little kids and a teaching job - time is of the essence). I am curious from those with split grade experience - do you do it just to save highlight information or does it give you more tonality and mid tone contrast? When do you know your negative is going to require something more than a single grade with dodging and burning ( I do usually change my contrast filter when dodging and burning)?

I have a large series of recent 35mm street work and some gallery access if I want it, so I need to mash out around 20-30 11x14s or maybe 16x20s (you know printing full frame so images will be smaller) in the next year or less. I just want to level up my printing and make a traditional BW fiber street show at the highest of quality and standards (and hopefully be able to re-print these later with ease). This conversation has given me a lot to think about and I love this debate so please continue. Someone asked for some print examples from me. This specular reflection (my only split filter attempt - just because - not sure if I needed it) and the cherry blossom images are from that series. It's called My Suburbia and you can see some of the scans on my website www.chrisarslain.com . Most all of the images are EMA pyro (510 & PyrocatHD) with good exposures so my highlights are in good shape (again most of the time - it's roll film)

The thing is I swore off 35mm years ago, but then I swore off iPhone camera, so now I have a street show lol. I also have a 35mm GAS issue now because I carry them everywhere. Maybe someday I can get back to my MF/LF color landscape and abstraction work. Thanks again to all! 🖖
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3600.jpg
    IMG_3600.jpg
    974.1 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG_3603.jpg
    IMG_3603.jpg
    980 KB · Views: 30

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,988
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I think you may be attributing different things to a split grade approach than I do.
Split grade does two things for me:
1) it allows me to choose any "grade" of contrast within the wide range of contrasts available from the paper and your light source, including what might be described as "fractional" grades; and
2) most importantly, it permits printing different parts of the negative with differing amounts of contrast.
Neither of those is particularly applicable to the issue you raise in this thread, although I guess the ability to make fractional grade adjustments is probably of some use when trying to respond to the different responses of the two types of paper.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom