• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Coverage of Goertz Apochromat Artar

Frozen Pool

Frozen Pool

  • 8
  • 6
  • 85
Greenhouse Volunteer

H
Greenhouse Volunteer

  • 3
  • 0
  • 62

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,404
Messages
2,840,271
Members
101,316
Latest member
ste81df
Recent bookmarks
1

herb

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
405
Format
Medium Format
I have a Goerz 19 inch f 11 lens, which I never use, but have no idea of the coverage. It is not a red dot, meaning it is pre 1950's (red dots came out then, I think).

It seems to cover 8x10 with no problems, but I don't know the max coverage.

Any thoughts on that?
 

c6h6o3

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 16, 2002
Messages
3,215
Format
Large Format
I have a Goerz 19 inch f 11 lens, which I never use, but have no idea of the coverage. It is not a red dot, meaning it is pre 1950's (red dots came out then, I think).

It seems to cover 8x10 with no problems, but I don't know the max coverage.

Any thoughts on that?

I get more movements with my 12" Dagor than I can my 19" Artar on the 8x10, but the Dagor is a little mushy at the edges if I use movements. It was made in 1911. The Artar (which is a Red Dot) is more uniformly sharp from edge to edge. It's angle of coverage, BTW, is 46°, with an image circle of 16.1" at f/16. Since it's an early one, the Dagor's angle of coverage should be about 85°.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom