Some good news (from my perspective).
I was picking up a 12"x18" colour print from my sort of local Costco yesterday and was really concerned when I saw a sign that indicated that they would be shut down for two days while they replaced their printers with new, upgraded equipment.
I was relieved, however, when they indicated that the new equipment still used colour photographic paper.
They do a lot of prints there, and their quality is quite good, especially considering that their prices are so low ($6.99 CDN for a 12"x18" print).
They of course only print from digital files, and they use Fuji rather than Kodak paper, but I'm still happy to use their services.
Good price for a 12x18" print if it is straight-through from digi files there is lots of competition for the print dollar here at retail level in Australia. But at a professional level things get very, very serious. I pay AUD$86.00 for the same RA-4 size (on Kodak Endura Professional Metallic) A-to-D RA-4/colourimetrics and processing). Yesterday I collected two 20x27" ($400). There is a Costco 75km from here but I've never been in there. Each time I see it from the window of my train home, there is a long line of cars waiting to get in. Apparently I would have to pay $60 a year just to get past the front gate. We've also noted they are entering the discount petrol (gas to you!) scene, giving the other two existing duopoly players are decent run for their money. Bring it on.
In the US one can order prints at Costco over the internet and have the prints shipped if I remember correctly. One email or telephone call could answer if this is possible for you in your country.
I have landed on their website and I must say how relatively threadbear it is in terms of information not even a phone number! Nothing about printing etc, and yes I'd have to join with a fee. I note there are 6 stores in Australia as opposed to many, many more in the US and Canada. Well, much bigger markets... They've been in the news here a couple of nights ago about the discount fuel thing and it caused a stir. We're now under a dollar a litre here for rocket fuel he first time in a long, long time.
Apparently I would have to pay $60 a year just to get past the front gate. We've also noted they are entering the discount petrol (gas to you!) scene, giving the other two existing duopoly players are decent run for their money. Bring it on.
I was relieved, however, when they indicated that the new equipment still used colour photographic paper.
And you take this to mean it's RA-4? I guess I don't see that, at least in the way you chose to phrase it. I don't digiprint images, but don't they call inkjet paper "photo paper" too? Pretty sure they do.
It does look like a very nice print with a lovelly split-grade of lighting (background/foreground), but what catches me is the composition and the ability of the photograph to arouse an connective-emotional response. We can almost reach out and shake the hand of the fishmonger (assuming that's what she is?), even start a conversation with her (and she has that sort of look that suggests she's listening intently to what is being said). The stylish, balancing flourish of her billowing, silver-grey mane is an added bonus. All up, a beaut photo to look at.
Ah shucks, thanks.
And from someone whose screen name translates to "Fish of the Day" too!
The scene is actually on the deck of a large fish boat, and she is one of the owners and crew.
You can see the side of the boat here - I was standing where the out of focus person is standing:
not sure about other states or countries, but in California you do not need a membership to buy alcohol there. some sort of ATF law or something.
Not sure I understand all the excitement. I called Costco and was told it is not a chemical process. Sounds to me to be like any Walmart or Walgreen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?