Copyright for photos taken in German museums

MattKing said:

To answer that, someone knowledgeable about the issue compares the facts at hand with the wording of the statute and the interpretations that the courts have provided over the years of how that wording applied to various similar facts.
In most cases, the answer is straightforward - often clearly reported in publicly accessible material. In some quite complex and highly nuanced cases, a deep understanding of the court cases will be necessary. And in the most difficult situations, a court will need to decide.
The need for the interpretations arise because circumstances evolve for a myriad of reasons - the common law has a built in ability to adapt to the changes of time.
In the vast majority of cases, the answer is quickly and easily determined by looking up the issue on the sort of materials referenced by Duceman.
Based on what I know about what Alan does with his photography, I'm confident that Alan will get any answers that he needs from those.

Click to expand...

MattKing said:

I didn't realize you were such a revolutionary Alan - seeking to change the entire US legal system into something entirely different, after nearly 250 years of the "American Experiment"
Sounds like the Roman/Civil Law model is closer to your heart.

Click to expand...

BrianShaw said:

Out of extreme curiosity... what law prohibits photographing a building that is in plain sight? Or commercial/editorial use of a photograph taken from public areas of items within plain view?

I have seen this, which deals largely with commercial and editorial usage of taken/created images, but it is not clear to me if this is based on trademark/licensing rights or something else.

Home | Shutterstock Contributor

Shutterstock Contributor

support.submit.shutterstock.com

Click to expand...

Alan Edward Klein said:

What is it in Roman Civil Law that I would like?

Click to expand...