Converting dichromates for gum and related processes

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,075
Messages
2,785,872
Members
99,796
Latest member
Alvinabc
Recent bookmarks
0

dorff

Member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Messages
443
Location
South Africa
Format
Multi Format
I stumbled across an article on water treatment for chromium (VI) contaminated effluents. The authors successfully used sodium sulphite solutions at fairly low pH to reduce Cr (VI) to Cr (III), the latter of course being relatively harmless. I haven't seen in my literature any suggestion that gum prints should be first washed in an acidic sulphite bath before further washing, but it seems like good practice to at least investigate whether that would make the bichromate processes more environmentally friendly.

There are a few questions worth asking though.

i) Will the low pH bath negatively affect the gelatin sizing or gum layers?
ii) How much post washing, or what alternative treatment, will be required if multiple layers are to be applied? Residual sulphite in the paper might consume some of the bichromate before UV exposure, rendering the sensitivity lower or affecting the contrast etc of the subsequent layer. If it is uneven, it would be worse.

These are of course only ideas at this stage. I will definitely look into it when I do gum printing again (soon, I hope!), but would welcome the response of regular gum printers.

Other reagents such as ferrous sulphate or ferrous ammonium sulphate may also be used, but since most APUGgers have sulphite stashed somewhere, I thought it would make for a neat practical way to reduce our environmental footprint.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Before disposing of any unwanted dichromate solutions they should be treated with sodium sulfite. The solution color will change from orange to green showing that the Cr (VI) has been reduced to Cr (III). Treating prints however may cause problems and is not recommended as it may damage the print.
 

Loris Medici

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
1,154
Location
Istanbul, Tu
Format
Multi Format
I think there is no Chrome(VI) left in the processed gum print, since you wash out the sensitizer and the hardening is done by means of Chrome(VI) being photoreduced to Chrome(III). Chrome(VI) in the wash water is another issue, but I don't know exactly how to reduce Chrome(VI) to Chrome(III) because I use very little (2-3 ml 5% for each layer) and flush with plenty of water. (Makes max. 0.04-0.06g Chrome(VI) in 2-3 liters of water when it goes into the city's sewer system, not taking into account the water that gets added when flushing thru the WC. This is an extremely unsignificant amnt.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom