I have recently acquired a De Vere 54 (not 504) enlarger to begin printing from large format negatives, having upgraded from an LPL C7700 6x7 enlarger.
This is my first condenser enlarger and I'm having one or two problems with even illumination and significant light fall-off towards the edges. The enlarger came with one condenser which is not labelled, but seems to give pretty even illumination with a 135mm lens. However when printing with my 50mm, 75mm, or 110mm lenses, there is extreme light fall-off towards the edges.
I suspect it will be difficult and/or expensive to get hold of different condensers for different focal lengths so for now I'm working around the problem by placing a piece of translucent plastic (from a light box) in the filter drawer. This helps a lot and I'm able to make prints using shorter lenses, although it still needs some edge burning.
I'm not tied to having a condenser enlarger; I got on fine with diffusers for medium format. I removed the condenser from this enlarger to see what it would do, and the result is a very uneven light, so obviously one cannot simply remove the condenser without also making other modifications.
What is involved in converting this head to a diffusion head? I could try putting one piece of translucent plastic in the filter drawer and another at the bottom of the condenser chamber (without the condenser in place). I could also try painting the inside of the lamphouse and condenser chamber in matt white to make the whole thing into a diffusion mixing box. Has anyone tried this, and is it likely to work? I'm also going to experiment with different light bulbs, including a traditional pearl bulb and also a couple of halogen reflectors, one of which has an enormous reflector to produce a wide beam.
I'm aware that diffusion enlargers produce less contrasty images (which is fine by me) and that they are less efficient with light, i.e. longer exposure times may be needed. Are there any other pitfalls?
Thanks,
Jonathan
This is my first condenser enlarger and I'm having one or two problems with even illumination and significant light fall-off towards the edges. The enlarger came with one condenser which is not labelled, but seems to give pretty even illumination with a 135mm lens. However when printing with my 50mm, 75mm, or 110mm lenses, there is extreme light fall-off towards the edges.
I suspect it will be difficult and/or expensive to get hold of different condensers for different focal lengths so for now I'm working around the problem by placing a piece of translucent plastic (from a light box) in the filter drawer. This helps a lot and I'm able to make prints using shorter lenses, although it still needs some edge burning.
I'm not tied to having a condenser enlarger; I got on fine with diffusers for medium format. I removed the condenser from this enlarger to see what it would do, and the result is a very uneven light, so obviously one cannot simply remove the condenser without also making other modifications.
What is involved in converting this head to a diffusion head? I could try putting one piece of translucent plastic in the filter drawer and another at the bottom of the condenser chamber (without the condenser in place). I could also try painting the inside of the lamphouse and condenser chamber in matt white to make the whole thing into a diffusion mixing box. Has anyone tried this, and is it likely to work? I'm also going to experiment with different light bulbs, including a traditional pearl bulb and also a couple of halogen reflectors, one of which has an enormous reflector to produce a wide beam.
I'm aware that diffusion enlargers produce less contrasty images (which is fine by me) and that they are less efficient with light, i.e. longer exposure times may be needed. Are there any other pitfalls?
Thanks,
Jonathan

