Contrast masks without pin-registration.

Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 3
  • 0
  • 36
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 4
  • 0
  • 39
Cole Run Falls

A
Cole Run Falls

  • 2
  • 2
  • 31
Clay Pike

A
Clay Pike

  • 4
  • 1
  • 32

Forum statistics

Threads
198,938
Messages
2,783,521
Members
99,752
Latest member
Giovanni23
Recent bookmarks
0

MMfoto

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
425
Format
Super8
I've been re-reading Ctein's "Post Exposure" lately. He talks a lot about his making of "slightly fuzzy" contrast masks that he visually tapes to his negs/tranny's on a light table.

I've been educating myself on Ilfochrome printing and have been a little hung up about my ability to utilize masking. I would like to use my Focomat Ic at least for a while due to the expense of anything with a pin system, not to mention the ease of use of the Focomat and it's printing charactoristics I like.

If I can make effective use of a 35mm contrast mask sandwiched with the original with my current setup than I'd be a happy guy. ( I need some good news with after the recent news from Forte and others!).

Will a slightly unsharp mask visually sandwiched with the original have a negative affect on local contrast and sharpness, or other unexpected consequences?
 

Robert Hall

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
2,033
Location
Lehi, Utah
Format
8x10 Format
You may get significant edge effects with the mask being out of registration.

Out of registration is not the same as being unsharp.

I would recommend that you try scratching the edges in an X with a pin on opposite corners of the neg, use those to register your chrome and tape them down.

How does that sound?
 
OP
OP

MMfoto

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
425
Format
Super8
I just had a thought. One could make an impromptu pin system just for making the mask that could be used to register the pair before taping them together and placing the TAPED pair into the carrier. Might not be perfect, but I think that could work out pretty well.
 

phfitz

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2004
Messages
539
Format
Large Format
MMfoto,

"If I can make effective use of a 35mm contrast mask sandwiched with the original with my current setup than I'd be a happy guy. ( I need some good news with after the recent news from Forte and others!)."

Where are you? I have a Weiss 'Super Duper' set-up to makes contract prints from 35mm. It aligns on the sprocket holes and was designed to do exactly what your are doing. The 'unsharp' masking also works very well for C-41 negs. Have it for the shipping cost, I have not used 35mm in years.

Send a PM with a snail-mail address.
 

Mike Wilde

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
2,903
Location
Misissauaga
Format
Multi Format
DIY unsharp rig for 35mm/120

I recently took a stab at unshap work, on medium format and 35m work, and here how I attacked it:

I made a u channel about 8" long using foam core board strips about 2" wide glued to another piece of foam core. They are placed the width of 120 film wide. In the bottom of the channel I glued a piece of matte black paper in place to prevent reflections from mucking up the exposure the bottom peice of film gets. There are also 2 pieces of 1/8" glass that is the width of 120 film, and a bit longer than one exposure that sits on top of the film sandwich to hold the films together during exposure, and a piece of frosted mylar (ala back when drafting people used ink) taped between the two pieces of the glass to act as the diffuser. I sanded the glass to make sure no sharp edges exist to scratch the original negative.

With the lights on, I take the negative of choice, and pierce the film between exposures at at least two locations, by pressing through the film while it rests against a claen scrap piece of foam core. Piercing an exposure one or two away from the negative area of interest makes it easier to place the glass block.

On the channel I temporarily lay the film in and add extra push pins on the edge channels to denote where to place the glass and diffussion.

Under safelight, I work with ortho lith film as my masking film. I take 8x10" sheets and trim them 120 format wide by 5" long in my paper cutter, while wearing cotton gloves. Cutting 4x5 down could work as well. By making them 5" long, the handling while processing gives you somewhere to hold onto with tongs, etc, while procesing without having to touch the mask of interest area.

Under safelight illumination the lith film is placed emulsion down in the foamcore channel, lined up so it fits between the pine denoting the area of interest, and also so that it gets stabbed by the two pins. The film is then placed on the channel, (in my case, emulsion side up, but I have seen it as going down as well). Under safelight I am able to see the existing pin holes, and place the pins now through the film, lith film, and into the foamcore channel bottom.

The diffusion glass block goes on, and the assembly is placed generaly under the centre of the enlarger lens. I have previously set the enlarger to a standard height, aperture, and make sure that there are no filters dialled in, and lens is focussed on an empty carrier (about 40cm, F11 for me). I find that 120 carrier requires that I give a 10 second exposure to the lith film, and 35mm requires that I give a 20 second exposure.

The lith film gets extracted from the carrier and is put into a 5x7" white plastic tray. About 100ml of low contrast developer is poured into the tray (enough so that the neg can slosh about, and not sit stuck over a tray rib, or a bromide streak will result) For lith, I have successfully used T/O XDR-4 to get continous tone out of this film; there are likely other developers used very diluted that work fine as well.

The tray is continuously agitated. At about 2 minutes the negative usually 'looks' to me to be about a .35 density; develop longer if you need a denser mask. I pull the mask film, rinse it vigourously in a water bath, and then dunk it in a TF-3 rapid fixer for about twice the time it takes to clear ( under two minutes minutes), and wash it for a minute or two more. I squeege it between my fingers, shake it dry, and hair dryer it the rest of the way to dry if I am impatient at the moment.

The dry mask goes back on the pins, and then bits of tape are used to hold the sandwich in registration when the pins are pulled, and the sandwich positioned into the negative carrier. I find sprocket holes (in 35mm) and film edge markings are good to get close, but look very carefully to make sure all is lined up, particularly with 35mm with its film curve.

Using this proceedure I make masks 'on the fly' during black and white printing sessions. I find by pre-pinning the neg I can hold the channel at an angle to the safelight and see the pin holes under OC amber safelight levels. If I am doing a lot of masks I might go and change to 1A red filters, to brighten the scene up while working only with the lith film.

To date I have not attempted to use pan film, to do unsharp masking with colour negatives. Howard bond has developed curves in his article in last years sept/oct and nov/dec Photo techniques, but I have not yet fully deciphierd his techniques on using them. I use my colourstar analyser in denisty measurement mode to get the denisty of the negative while it is projected onto the baseboard, and it be zeroed to automaticaly subtract film base plus fog, so that helps to speed the math along.
 

Neal

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
2,020
Location
Chicago, West Suburbs
Format
Multi Format
Dear MMfoto,

Give the method as described in "Post Exposure" a try. If you work carefully and have a reasonable (not too dense) mask you should be quite pleased with the results..

Neal Wydra
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom