Contax RTS vs RTS2 whats the difference?

harlequin

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
239
Location
Los Angeles/San Antonio
Format
Medium Format
Dear Photorio Members,

I have an opportunity to get a Contax RTS2, in trade for some items.

I have used an RTS many years ago as my camera was being serviced.

Is it possible to get an adaptor for Nikon or canon lenses on it, as the Planars etc
are still very pricy, even the 50mm 1.4 is almost at Hasselblad levels...

Does any APUG member have sample shot with this camera, was wondering
if there is anything to look out for other than a sticky feeling on the body....

Thanks!

Harlequin
 

IN468

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
3
Format
Medium Format
the only reason to buy a contax RTS /RTS2 are the Zeiss lenses, you cant adapt nikkor or canon lenses without a lens in the adaptor

the dream lenses are distagon 1,4/35 and planar 1,4/85
 

bimmey

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
98
Location
New Hampshire
Format
Multi Format
I have used both, and still have the RTS. The lens kit is 28mm 2.8 50mm 1.4 and 85mm 2.8 As IN468 said the lenses are the only reason to get the RTS II. Some samples had electrical problems, and my camera repair guy had disdain for them. The improved LED data display is enough to opt for the RTS II.
 

Alan Gales

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,253
Location
St. Louis, M
Format
Large Format
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Contax_RTS_II

To add to this, the RTSll has an electronic self timer instead of a mechanical one. The RTSll also has a switch to lock the shutter release where I don't think the original RTS did.

I've never owned one but I shot a Contax 139 for many years. I also owned a couple 167MT's. Like others have said, the main reason to own Contax is for the Zeiss glass. I have found Contax are the most ergonomical 35mm cameras followed by Leica R series. Of course this was with my hands.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
An RTS II would be a quality upgrade over an RTS - the RTS is getting old enough that the internal electronics are no longer reliable. These days, though, an RTS III is quite affordable, relatively speaking. It's a brick of a camera, though - not for the small of hands or weak of forearm. The RTS II can at least be used with the motor winder detached if you want to lighten the load. What are you being asked to trade for the RTS II, and what guarantees do you have as to the serviceability of the camera?
 

Fixcinater

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
2,500
Location
San Diego, CA
Format
Medium Format
The RTS can be used with the relatively inexpensive Yashica lenses, which seem to me to be typical Japanese quality from the era. Also, there is an M42 adapter available (Fotodiox) that will allow infinity focus, if you get the one without a lip around the entire mount. Has to look like the original Pentax M42/PK adapter, and you could grab a Tamron Adapt-all lens mount and use some of their SP or otherwise nicer lenses in that lineup as well.

The Planar 50/1.4 is very very good, however, it's the reason I have an RTS body.
 

Alan Gales

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,253
Location
St. Louis, M
Format
Large Format

So is the 50mm f1.7 lens that came with my Contax 139. It's cheaper too but of course not as fast. Before I bought my Zeiss 180mm f2.8 lens I had a Tamron SP zoom lens. It was a very nice lens!
 

colin wells

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
179
Location
UK
Format
35mm
I use an RTS with the lens adapter for M42 mount the M42 adapter opens the door to a whole host of cheap quality lenses Zeiss, Pentacon, Pentax are all usable with excellent results .For some reason M42 are cheap even Zeiss
 

naaldvoerder

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
705
Format
35mm
The rts and the rts 2 are two very different camera's with a very similar look. The 2 has a titanium shutter and a bigger viewfinder coverage, among other improvements.
 

pentaxpete

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
635
Location
Brentwood, England
Format
Multi Format
I was given an RTS II Quartz ( saved it from 'The Dump'') with winder, huge flash etc and the 50mm f1.4 Planar T* but it seems to suffer from 'back focus' at f1.4 -- to get it sharp enough I have to focus forward. I don't reckon it is any better than my 1975 era 50mm f1.4 SMC Takumar - the famous 'Radio-Active' one , I used the Planar on my Yashica FR-1 saved form The Dump at the same time to see if the focus is better.
50mm f1.4 Zeiss Planar T* at f1.4 on FR-1
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,715
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
 

philosli

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
57
Location
US
Format
Multi Format

As many said, the reason you want to use Contax bodies are the Zeiss lenses. Most of these lenses are not cheap because they can be adapted to digital bodies for still and video.

The best bang for the buck in the lens line up, IMHO, is the 50mm f/1.7. It is probably less than $200 on the used market but I haven’t checked the price for a long while. I have used both 50mm f1.4 (which I own now) and f1.7. I actually prefer the later.

I have 4 lenses: 28mm 2.8, 35mm 2.8, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4. The 85mm 1.4 is the most special among the 4. But it is really a portrait lens, because it’s really heavy and bulky to be carried around.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,715
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Again why not a Yashica FR or FX, in good condition under $50.00, the FR will take a motor drive, use any Zeiss lens in Contax/Yashica mount.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…