I shot a Contax 139 for many years. I owned 5 Zeiss lenses. I loved that camera and the lenses were superb.
Hi Alan,
+1 to that.
In 1987 I bought a new Canon EOS 650 with some lenses, photos were good, but the whole experience (AF, plastic) was not satisfiing.
Sold the stufff in 1988 and got me a Contax 139 with 2.8/28 and 1.4/50 (later a 1.4/85 and 4/18 came).
This little camera served and enjoyed me for 25 years, until the film transport mechanics failed...
Got me a RTSII, but it is much heavier and the mirror now starts hitting the 18mm Distagon. Will be fixed.
Greetings
Jens[/QUOTE
Hello Jens,
I owned the 25mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.7, 100mm f/3.5 and 180mm f/2.8. I bought them all in the 1980's. Your 18mm was my dream lens but I couldn't afford it back then. The only reason I was able to buy the 180mm was a new lens came out with an electrical contact for program mode. One of the salesmen at the local camera store told me they were putting the older display lens on clearance. I was able to buy it at their cost. Sometimes it's good to be friends with camera salesmen.
The same thing happened with my 139. I had bought the camera brand new but wore the thing out from using it so much!
Alan
The ergonomics of the AX are, well, shall we say less than optimal. It's far from terrible, but compared to the rest of the lineup, it's a brick in the hand. And that autofocus mechanism has me worried about long-term reliability.Why does nobody suggest the Contax AX. Wow, autofocus with any manual focus lens, even with a "no focus" magnifying glass, provided you can graft it onto the front of the camera at roughly the right distance spacing.
Can anyone help I'm really struggling to focus on my contax 159mm when I'm stopping down, the split focus goes dark on one side so it's difficult to focus without opening the apature up again to refocus.
I cannot remember this being a issue years ago in my Olympus, I'm currently using M42 lenses so the apature is always what I set it.
Ok cheers looks like I'll be selling them to fund a new lens.That is an expected drawback of using those lenses. With C/Y you will not have that problem.
I've heard it's good currently watching one online, also considering a 50mm 1.4 or 1.7 but I've read the 1.7 is sharper also I wouldn't mind a 35mm but I not seen many.As to your earlier question, if someone put a gun to my head and told me "you can have only one Contax lens - which is it", I'd say the 35-70. It has its limitations, and is not the very best at lots of things, but it is damn good at everything it does do, and you won't be disappointed.
Sharpness is sometimes overrated. I have had both the 1.7 and the 1.4 and there's just something about the look of images from the 1.4 that I prefer.I've heard it's good currently watching one online, also considering a 50mm 1.4 or 1.7 but I've read the 1.7 is sharper also I wouldn't mind a 35mm but I not seen many.
Hi I know this is a super old thread, would be interested to know why Aria's have not the mirror slip problem vs the other C/Y Contax bodies. Thanks !The RTSIII, Aria, RX and ST all provide both spot metering and centre weighted average metering. I never had any of the cameras I own fail me, except for user induced damage (putting a film leader through the titanium shutter blades). The 139Q and the 159MM I got non-working, free or nearly free. Both suffered from dirty shutter release magnets, an easy fix I did myself. A common occurrence with camera's with electronic shutters that have not been used for a long time. Another common problem in Contaxes, except for the Aria, is mirror slip. Very easily fixable too. That said I do not value reliability and battery independance over handling and feature set. If any of them break down, beyond my repair abilities, I will just replace it. If I visit places I will not likely return to, I bring 2 bodies and spare batteries. But I would do that too, if I was shooting with Nikons or Canons.
The Aria has a closed frame to hold the mirror. By the time of its introduction Contax was aware of the problem.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?