Why but go anywhere, the expense just for that 2 week away I could get another camera with a lens
Anyone on this boat? For myself I have maybe concentrated too much on photography and compromised it.
For example, many would say you enjoy life and people and use the camera to capture the moments esp with say travel photography right or just people and event stuff even family vacations. I have times just stuck muesli bars in my bag because that lunch meal might had got me an extra roll of film and processing! When I am with others on a trip which is maybe something I don't do all that often, we visit somewhere, since I am to capture the golden sunset, I split up with the group. Oh how as XYZ holiday, oh it was fantastic, I stood outside for 2hrs during sunset and came back and got takeaways - hahah. Why but go anywhere, the expense just for that 2 week away I could get another camera with a lens. Then again you see non photography people and they have gone to more photographic destinations than myself. So often in the past I have just stayed home with my camera gear and when I have gone out it was within a 20 mile radius - I am talking about non stop for a good few years. Yup, not even jumped onto a plane or a road trip away, not even a statutory holiday.
As a result of this I have been more critical of my chance of getting good photos and ie - when I am out in the day time when the light is strong is maybe just shoot with a smaller camera body with a smaller lens and it's more street / candid / snapshot style. So I only take the big stuff out at night when I do have that moment to myself occasionally but I don't max it out, ie - I don't say every night I am by myeslf you guys do your off stuff. Yes, I have also shot off a tripod in summer at mid afternoon.
Cheers.
Sell your Leica to fund a family vacation?We are here fifteen years now and no two weeks vacations at all. Simply no money for it.
I have two. One is my mother gift to me. Would you sell your mother gift?Sell your Leica to fund a family vacation?
I have two. One is my mother gift to me. Would you sell your mother gift?
Another is M4-2 I purchased for 650$ by selling some gear I repaired.
It is worth of ... 650$.
Get real. First, not every Leica is luxury item.
Second, I never been in financial situation to buy Leica which costs multiple thousands dollars. My wife would divorce me.
Third, we need more than 650 $ for three plus two and two weeks.
If I sell all of my Leica gear exsept mother's Leica it is not going to get us anywhere.
Get real, stop brashing Leica enthusiasts as rich.
With this I cannot agree. For me most important part of photography is visiting new places. If you have 2 good cameras and 2 good lenses - that is enough for a lifetime (I have more than 10 cameras/lenses - more than I will even need, I bring on a vacation 2 cameras only, on rare occasions 3). But I understand that for some other this is not needed (I think for example of Josef Sudek who did lot of his work in his house and backyard).
I
Nobody will care that I got that perfect Eiffel Tower shot like thousands upon thousands of others, nobody would care that I took the perfect sunset shot...but to me, I will always cherish the images of my Mom's 87th birthday party last year, and I will always cherish the images of my wedding day...etc.
So the answer for me is: yes...take a camera with me at all times but forget it's there. Experience life first! Take pictures second.
Then give yourself a project to photograph near your home. Doesn't really matter what it is about - it could be your literal backyard, it could be the neighborhood you live in, it could be your favorite park, it could be the barbershop where you get your hair cut. But just go and take pictures of that place/those people, and keep doing it even if you feel like it's been "seen out". The whole "best images when I was traveling" thing is a cliche - you think that way because you're emotionally attached to those images and they have a memory trigger for you. But you can learn to take images that do the same thing in your home environment, and in the long run, they'll be even more emotive once you realize what you're seeing in them and why you took that picture in the first place.I know what you mean. It is not exactly GAS as I don't just buy and buy I have self control or assessment but maybe it is how I place more value on photographic goods than other things even thou I know I shouldn't do that. When I do look back at my images the better images were the ones I went away not the 90% of those images taken near home.
Try shooting for a while with a "toy" camera like a Holga or a Lomo. They're actually quite liberating because they take so many decisions away from you, and all you really can do at that point is concentrate on making the image. This is coming from someone who shoots a lot with large format, a Rolleiflex and a Mamiya RZ. I've done my biggest long-term project ever with a Lomo Belair that shoots 2 1/4 x 4 1/4 panoramics on 120 roll film, and all I can do with the Lomo is compose, focus, and choose between f/8 and f/16. Now I'm playing around with a Lomo LCA 120, which has just zone focusing. It's fully auto exposure - you have no say in aperture or shutter speed. Working with a camera like that teaches you a whole new perspective on image-making and perceptions about gear and value for money.Can clearly relate to this. I used to shoot a 12PM summer cityscape with a tripod (!). Funny that how I seem how to place more value on photographic equipment but it is not the all and end all. I appreciated more of the shots I have taken when I have been away and I have taken more shots that way, so I suppose 90% of the time when I have been home bound captured 60% of my images. It is that thought if I can juts manage a few yrs sitting at home I can get XYZ and it will be mine, under my ownership.
not every Leica is luxury item.
Last vacation: I am walking with my LTM and Elmar - value 250€. Makes superb quality photos. I see one tourist in Italian speaking group - he has Leica monochrome with 50mm APO summicron (value 15.000€).
With this I cannot agree. For me most important part of photography is visiting new places. If you have 2 good cameras and 2 good lenses - that is enough for a lifetime (I have more than 10 cameras/lenses - more than I will even need, I bring on a vacation 2 cameras only, on rare occasions 3). But I understand that for some other this is not needed (I think for example of Josef Sudek who did lot of his work in his house and backyard).
raveling and taking vacation and how days off are paid in Europe is totally different story from traveling and vacation here.
Our relatives are in Belgium and they are on vacay and traveling often, while on low qualifications job or on pension. Then we hear how much they are paying for train tickets and vacation packages within Europe it is like next to free comparing to ripoff here.
It comes down to priorities. I remember an acquaintance (no longer a friend - longish story) of mine who used to regularly complain about never being able to save up for a deposit on a house.... who would then drop $5K on a piece of photography equipment.
Anyone on this boat? For myself I have maybe concentrated too much on photography and compromised it.
For example, many would say you enjoy life and people and use the camera to capture the moments esp with say travel photography right or just people and event stuff even family vacations. I have times just stuck muesli bars in my bag because that lunch meal might had got me an extra roll of film and processing! When I am with others on a trip which is maybe something I don't do all that often, we visit somewhere, since I am to capture the golden sunset, I split up with the group. Oh how as XYZ holiday, oh it was fantastic, I stood outside for 2hrs during sunset and came back and got takeaways - hahah. Why but go anywhere, the expense just for that 2 week away I could get another camera with a lens. Then again you see non photography people and they have gone to more photographic destinations than myself. So often in the past I have just stayed home with my camera gear and when I have gone out it was within a 20 mile radius - I am talking about non stop for a good few years. Yup, not even jumped onto a plane or a road trip away, not even a statutory holiday.
As a result of this I have been more critical of my chance of getting good photos and ie - when I am out in the day time when the light is strong is maybe just shoot with a smaller camera body with a smaller lens and it's more street / candid / snapshot style. So I only take the big stuff out at night when I do have that moment to myself occasionally but I don't max it out, ie - I don't say every night I am by myeslf you guys do your off stuff. Yes, I have also shot off a tripod in summer at mid afternoon.
Cheers.
+1I started out that way (not that long ago) and then realized that photography (for me) is a way to document and celebrate my life; my experiences, my loved ones, the important events in my life...etc. I changed from trying to make good photos to trying to make photos that mean something to me. Photos that I can pull out of a shoe box in 20 years and relive moments and relive relationships.
Nobody will care that I got that perfect Eiffel Tower shot like thousands upon thousands of others, nobody would care that I took the perfect sunset shot...but to me, I will always cherish the images of my Mom's 87th birthday party last year, and I will always cherish the images of my wedding day...etc.
So the answer for me is: yes...take a camera with me at all times but forget it's there. Experience life first! Take pictures second.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?