• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Comparing brands for in-camera processing (JPEG or otherwise)

multivoiced

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
119
Location
Western USA
Format
Multi Format
For those who prefer to avoid post-processing, which cameras help you to get it right?

Someone wrote at 43 Rumors about why he prefers Nikon:

And again:

Does your experience confirm this, or do you have a different preference outside of Nikon?
 
I can only speak to Fuji (x100vi) and recently took the leap to shooting jpg and not sure I'll go back to RAW. I'll do a RAW as a backup but it seems jpg with some tweaks is getting me there.
 
multivoiced said:
Are you referring to Panasonic, Leica, or both?
Click to expand...

I know very little of Panasonic. Last one I had was the Lumix DMC-LX2 from the mid 2000s that shot a 16:9 panoramic format. Nice camera, died years later from a stream sensor--or at least major streaking in the image.
 
Nikon has become interesting especially after introducing film grain in select bodies. If anyone has dived into the details, it would be useful to compare with the use of lookup tables (LUT) in other brands, for instance.
 
multivoiced said:
For those who prefer to avoid post-processing, which cameras help you to get it right?

Someone wrote at 43 Rumors about why he prefers Nikon:


And again:


Does your experience confirm this, or do you have a different preference outside of Nikon?
Click to expand...
My Leica Monochrome M 246 goes get "it" right most of the time. I just set "Contrast" one notch above the medium position, and that is all i need.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register