Commercialism - and the dirty people who practice it

Michael A. Smith

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
660
Before I get attacked again I thought I should clarify. I wrote, "I do not know one photographer working as an artist who ever makes a photograph just to make money. I'm not alone here."

I should have written. "I do not know one photographer working as an artist who ever makes a photograph as art for themselves who makes it just to make money. I'm not alone here."

Many photographers who work primarily as artists also do commercial photographs. And as I wrote above, I welcome every opportunity that comes my way.
 

Cheryl Jacobs

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
1,717
Location
Denver, Colo
Format
Medium Format

Hmm, well, I certainly hear that a lot and can therefore understand where Michael was coming from. Personally, I saw nothing offensive about his post. I'm guessing he's grinning right about now at seeing several people jump to the defense/offense (depending on where you're standing.)

Can't deny the guy can write.
 

127

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
580
Location
uk
Format
127 Format
Some might sell themselves taking photographs.

The alternative is to sell yourself making burgers, or answering phones for a fraction of the reward.

Everyone sells something of themselves in exchange for something else they want (like food and a roof over their heads). Those who work 6 days a week slaving on minimum wage are selling far more of themselves than someone who does something they love. If you can work as a photographer for someone else two days a week, and have five days to do your own thing then you're doing better than most and deserve respect...

Ian
 

Ed Sukach

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
4,517
Location
Ipswich, Mas
Format
Medium Format

Last things first: NO, I disagree with the idea that your opinion is "useless". I value it - and I'll use to form some sort of framework of "you". Your opinion is certainly to be rated on an objective scale as "high" as mine. Why shouldn't it be?

Now ... Paparazzi ... In a former life, when I still had good knees and better feet...

After the "Princess Diana" tragedy, there was a panic-knee-jerk reaction directed toward ALL "Paparazzi". All of it was based on false assumptions - if anyone had ever been so engaged, the stupidity of the accusations were so obvious that it was difficult to argue against them.

One "High on the Scale Actor" was most vehemently denouncing Paparazzi. Their answer was to give him exactly what he said he wanted: they ignored him. No one to wait with a camera as he left the plane, no one to "catch" him coming out of a Night Club, or "Being Seen with ..."
It didn't take long for his PR people to react - there were numerous "leaks" and "Ooops - I didn't mean to let that information out ..." It was only after the violent attacks on them subsided, and things quieted down, that the "Pappa" once again returned, and the PR people could relax.

I know what the stereotype of Paparazzi is -- and like all Stereotypes, it is really inaccurate. The relationship is FAR more "symbiotic" than most of the RAMs would suppose it to be.

OK ... If you have a negative opinion of Paparazzi ... how do you feel about those who "do" Spot News?

Once upon a time ... There was an aspiring "Starlet", and the local guys were leaked the information that she would be walking down a certain Boardwalk, at a certain time.
The time came for the Starlet to walk, and she did - and at the proper place, "fell" out of the top of her bathing suit. Predictably, cameras clicked. She turned toward the guys and started her rampage ... "You guy are ..." Pappa #1 interrupted: "Damn camera screwed up - I didn't get anything." Papa #2 -"So did mine. Film advance problem", #3 - nearly the same....
The Starlet went back to the starting point and retraced her steps. Astoundingly, at the *same" spot - the *same* accident happened - she fell out - again. Once more - "Camera Problem ... no photos" - etc.
Once again she retraced her steps ... fell out ... and realized that, in fact, the cameras were more reliable than she had been led to believe. No rant this time ... just a lot of laughter.
 

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,230
Format
Large Format

Your viewpoint does not surprise me in the least. I am fully aware of the primary emphasis of your work.
 

Francesco

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Messages
1,016
Location
Düsseldorf,
Format
8x10 Format
"I, and a few others here take IMAGES ( I just said that to piss people off)"

Why do you want to piss people off?

"Can't deny the guy can write."

I do not agree at all! He must write in code!

I personally think that there is an envious tone to the start of this thread - it seems like someone is trying to justify their raison d'etre. When you have to do so in writing and publicly, it speaks volumes. Show us your work and let it speak for itself.
 

Foto Ludens

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2004
Messages
1,121
Format
Multi Format
Ed, what I meant to say by "my opinion doesn't matter" is that it reflects my prejudices. My prejudices should not be the basis for anyone else's actions/opinions. This does not go for myself alone, but for everyone else as well.

If we accept the fact that no two of us are alike, that is, accept the fact that the difference exists even if you disagree with the difference, this whole argument wouldn't exist in the first place.

And now to everyone else (read the lines below as good hearted suggestions)

Don't be pissed because people have different opinions from yours, be thankful. If everyone though like you, odds are they would act like you. Shoot & print like you. Your pictures would no longer be yours, they would be everyone else's. What would be the point of shooting, then? Self discovery is useless if you know the outcome.
 

photomc

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Messages
3,575
Location
Texas
Format
Multi Format
Sean, for some reason this thread is going nowhere..this horse is dead....
 

Aggie

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Messages
4,914
Location
So. Utah
Format
Multi Format
I bumped up an old thread of Blansky's that he did a beautiful job of writing about ansel Liebowitz. Time to get back to the fun and puruse his first attempt at creative writing for apug.
 

Cheryl Jacobs

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
1,717
Location
Denver, Colo
Format
Medium Format
Your viewpoint does not surprise me in the least. I am fully aware of the primary emphasis of your work.
Click to expand...

Actually, Donald, you're not aware of the primary emphasis of my work if you believe it to be portraiture, which I have picked up in the last few months. If you took time to actually find out what the primary emphasis of my work was, you might be a bit surprised.

All the same to me, though. I've no time for people who take themselves so seriously.

- CJ
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Lighten up, folks. I think by now most people should be able to appreciate the fact that Blansky writes these missives with a certain degree of irony. If you're getting worked up about them, you've missed the point.
 

Ed Sukach

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
4,517
Location
Ipswich, Mas
Format
Medium Format
Andre R. de Avillez said:
My prejudices should not be the basis for anyone else's actions/opinions. This does not go for myself alone, but for everyone else as well.
Click to expand...

But what if I WANT them to be the basis for my opinion? It is entirely possible that what you have said in your opinion does have a significant effect - and I will start to think differently.

In truth, that doesn't happen frequently - but ...

What I am saying is to "Be Free" - select whatever "place" you want, for ANY reason you want.
Tell you what - I won't apologize for my opinions if you don't apologize for yours. And no one will attack - or demand a change - for anyone else's, either.

We ARE all different - AND we are all equal in importance - which is a LOT.

Not a very good way to start a Flame War, is it?
 

bjorke

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
2,263
Location
SF sometimes
Format
Multi Format
IMO it's impossible to separate an artist selflessly devoted to their art from an artist selfishly devoted to themselves.
 

jd callow

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 31, 2003
Messages
8,466
Location
Milan
Format
Multi Format
bjorke said:
IMO it's impossible to separate an artist selflessly devoted to their art from an artist selfishly devoted to themselves.
Click to expand...
Does that work for a philosopher selflessly devoted to the persuit of truth, or the Doctor selflessly devoted to finding a cure, or a detective selflessly devoted to finding the criminal and so on or is it just artists?
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Does it matter? Bad people sometimes produce good work, and good people often produce bad work.
 

Foto Ludens

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2004
Messages
1,121
Format
Multi Format

Then use my prejudices at your own risk

I always put a disclaimer by my comment; I've found that it's better to be safe than sorry
 

bjorke

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
2,263
Location
SF sometimes
Format
Multi Format
Callow, I suggest you consider the paradox inherent in the concept: "selflessly devoted to their art"

their art?
 

jd callow

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 31, 2003
Messages
8,466
Location
Milan
Format
Multi Format
Boy has this thread been educational. I learned that all those hundreds of hours studying 1000s of works of art across the epoch of humankind and the 10s of thousands of words written about them by what I thought were some of the greatest minds was a waste of time. The Art no better than Avedon, and the words, copious elitist quasi-intellectual masturbation.

Wow, To think whilst I was learning about a culture’s rise and fall by studying their art I could have been selflessly defending the hobbyists privilege to expose film (however imperfectly), Just like Mikey and make boatloads of money to boot.

The saddest thing I learned was what a crass waste of a life it is to be devoted to art. Here I thought I was trying to record something of significance, add some value, but all I was doing was being selfishly devoted to myself.

God I hope my wife doesn’t find out.
 

David R Munson

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
425
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Format
Medium Format
mrcallow said:
...and the words, copious elitist quasi-intellectual masturbation.
Click to expand...

Glad I could be of service.

While I may rail against art society a fair amount, I still believe in the concept of fine art and the arts in general. There is nothing wrong with devoting one's life to art - what bothers me is the pretentious attitude and assumed superiority that comes along with it. Maybe I'm just extra-aware of it because I'm mostly involved in commercial applications of photography, but there is a definite bias against commercial work in much of the fine art community. I can understand where people are coming from sometimes, because there is some pretty worthless commercial work out there. But there's also commercial work that is every bit as valid from the standpont of fine arts as straight up "fine art" photography. It just happens to have a secondary purpose. The fact that one makes money off of an image in no way negates its artistic validity, as I see it. I remember a few years back someone relating on one of the Photo.net forums hearing an art critic on NPR criticizing a Boston art museum for having a show of Herb Ritts' work because, as far as the critic was concerned, a commercial photographer has no place in a museum of fine art. That is the sort of thing that pisses me off.
 

Leon

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
2,075
Location
UK
Format
Medium Format
Apug really does my head in sometimes (to coin a colloquial english phrase)! It's only opinions - does it really matter? There are way bigger fish to fry.
 

Juraj Kovacik

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
473
Location
Bratislava,
Format
Large Format
If you know how badly I envy you the fact, that you can live with photo all your life. Why do you think that somebody can assume that making money by .. analysis, for example ... is better then making money by taking pictures of children or making photo for add? And if somebody DO this assumption, ask him for what he is paying for.

A life of a "weekend photographer" is usually split in two uncomplementary parts what could be fine for study of schizophrenia but what doesn't look as the best way how to find a satisfaction, regardless what your definition of satisfaction is. I really don't think there is something you have to complain about.

And btw, hockey World champion is going in Prague and I hope for Saturday's final match Slovakia against USA (tomorrow is semifinal match Slovakia - Canada). And I'm afraid that could be source of new frustration for you, Michael, because we are going to beat you. JK
 

KenM

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2003
Messages
800
Location
Calgary, Alb
Format
4x5 Format

Sorry, you've got it all wrong. Canada vs USA in the final on Sunday.

I'm afraid you're the one who'll be frustrated

Cheers!

-klm (who's trying to lighten the atmosphere around here)
 

Juraj Kovacik

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
473
Location
Bratislava,
Format
Large Format
Dear Ken, hold your dreams while you can. They are going to be finished tomorrow... Canada is a nice country, how one can see on www.acanadianplace.com, but you forgot how to play a good hockey. Tomorow you will have a lesson so you can learn something...



.. only joking, hope it would be a good game... JK
 

mark

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Messages
5,703
All this hockey talk is offensive. I do not think this site should be used to promote blood sports
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…